Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants
Damn Van Hilleary for not pulling out thus giving Corker the nomination.

Could you elaborate?

10 posted on 10/11/2006 6:41:34 PM PDT by Tim Long (Mountjoy for Senate. Noonan for Governor. McClintock for Lt. Governor. Poochigian for Attorney Gen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Tim Long

The Republican Primary was a three-way race between Bryant, Corker, and Van Hilleary. The Conservative vote was split between Bryant and Van Hilleary, allowing Corker to win.

A lot of us think Bryant would have made a much better candidate in the General Election than Corker.


13 posted on 10/11/2006 6:47:20 PM PDT by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Tim Long

Bryant was a true conservative running for the seat. Van Hilleary joined the race, giving two fairly conservative choices. Either would likely have been fine, but Bryant seemed to be out ahead. Corker, a RINO, entered the race and spent tons of his own money to pull ahead and win. If Van Hilleary had dropped out and left only one conservative, Bryant would have won hands down.

Aside from the fact that the majority of the votes that were for VH would have gone to Bryant, many of the votes for Corker were because they believed his line that he had the best chance against Ford. (Bryant did better in polls against Ford.) And we have open primaries, since it was close, some Democrats crossed over to vote for someone they thought Ford could beat.


18 posted on 10/11/2006 8:31:14 PM PDT by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el inglés)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson