Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton's Latest Glow Job [Ann Coulter]
AnnCoulter.com ^ | October 11, 2006 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 10/11/2006 3:17:13 PM PDT by pogo101

With the Democrats' full-throated moralizing of late, I'm almost tempted to vote for them — although perhaps "full-throated" is the wrong phrase to use with regard to Democrats and sex scandals. The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer to talk about anything other than national security.

Unfortunately for them, the psychotic Kim Jong Il seems to be setting off nukes, raising the embarrassing issue of the Clinton administration's 1994 "peace" deal with North Korea.

At least with former Rep. Mark Foley, you could say the Democrats' hypocritical grandstanding was just politics. But in the case of North Korea, Democrats are resorting to bald-faced lies.

Current New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration official Bill Richardson has been on tour, bragging about the groundbreaking Clinton administration negotiations with North Korea — keeping his fingers crossed that no one has access to news from 1994.

In 1994, the Clinton administration got a call from Jimmy Carter — probably collect — who was with the then-leader of North Korea, saying: "Hey, Kim Il Sung is a total stud, and I've worked out a terrific deal. I'll give you the details later."

Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished.

Under the terms of the "agreed framework," we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes — more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return, they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn't difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.

Yes, you read that right: North Korea promised not to develop nukes, and we showed how much we trusted them by agreeing to no weapons inspections for five years.

The famed "allies," whom liberals claim they are so interested in pleasing, went ballistic at this cave-in to North Korea. Japan and South Korea — actual allies, unlike France and Germany — were furious. Even Hans Blix thought we were being patsies.

If you need any more evidence that it was a rotten deal, The New York Times hailed it as "a resounding triumph."

At the time, people like William Safire were screaming from the rooftops that allowing North Korea to escape weapons inspections for five years would "preclude a pre-emptive strike by us if North Korea, in the next U.S. president's administration, breaks its agreement to freeze additional bomb-making."

And then on Oct. 17, 2002 — under a new administration, you'll note — The New York Times reported on the front page, so you couldn't have missed it: "Confronted by new American intelligence, North Korea has admitted that it has been conducting a major clandestine nuclear weapons development program for the past several years."

So when it comes to North Korea, I believe the Democrats might want to maintain a discreet silence, lest anyone ask, "Hey, did you guys do anything with North Korea?"

But by Richardson's lights, the only reason Kim Jong Il is testing nukes is because Bush called him evil. He said, "When you call him axis of evil or a tyrant, you know, he just goes crazy." This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann, not someone who might know people who read newspapers.

Richardson also blames the war in Iraq, bleating that the poor North Koreans feel "that there's too much attention on the Middle East, on Iraq. So it's a cry for attention." If Kim just wanted our attention, he could have started dating Lindsay Lohan. But Richardson says Kim "psychologically feels he's been dissed, that he's not treated with respect."

Damn that Bush! If only he had ignored the crazy Muslims and dedicated himself into sending flowers (and more nuclear reactors!) to North Korea, we could be actively helping Kim develop his nukes like the Clinton administration did.

As Richardson said, Kim "wants us to negotiate with him directly, as we did in the Clinton administration."

To go on TV and propose negotiating with North Korea like Clinton did without ever mentioning that North Korea cheated on that agreement before the ink was dry would be like denouncing American aggression against Japan in 1942 and neglecting to mention Pearl Harbor. Anyone who is either that stupid or that disingenuous should not be allowed on TV.

When pressed by CNN's Anderson Cooper about the failed deal, Richardson lied, claiming the 1994 deal prevented the North Koreans from building nukes "for eight years" — i.e., right up until the day The New York Times reported the North Koreans had been developing nukes "for the past several years."

Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce. In fact, he's so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action. Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the "Dear Leader" is an actual pederast. Then we'll at least be able to read his instant messages.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; anncoulter; fauxsexscandal; kimiljong; markfoley; northkorea; presidentclinton; rewritinghistory; sexwhatsex; snowjob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: sergeantdave
I've always had trouble determining whether the Clinton's hatred classifies them as communists or Nazis. Both seem to change their masks according to circumstances.

They are Communists for sure, but then there really isn't that much difference. Hitler was a Socialist as well. Too bad the public is so clueless, we would never have to worry about these two corrupt treasonous scum again.

61 posted on 10/11/2006 8:01:13 PM PDT by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

Ann Coulter Bump!

(Give 'em Hell, Ann!)


62 posted on 10/11/2006 9:18:51 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Good job with the action Bubba.


63 posted on 10/11/2006 9:27:28 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: george76

Thank you!


64 posted on 10/11/2006 9:30:11 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

(laughing) You absolutely nailed it, Diana! Every point you made was on my, er, private list...


65 posted on 10/11/2006 10:12:43 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
I know that Kim wears lifts but still, your photo demonstrates just what a munchkin Madame Albright is.
66 posted on 10/11/2006 10:26:23 PM PDT by redheadtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

Another masterpiece from Ann Coulter!
No wonder the lying scumbag Democrats despise her so much.
(Of course, holding up the truth to the lying scumbag Democrats is like holding up a cross to Dracula.)


67 posted on 10/11/2006 10:33:57 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redheadtoo
I know that Kim wears lifts but still, your photo demonstrates just what a munchkin Madame Albright is.

I heard that p.o.s. Kim used to stuff a potato in his pants, too. Then one day an aid told him, "Uh, Mr. Kim? I think you are supposed to stuff the potato in the front."

68 posted on 10/11/2006 10:39:51 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
You know, that's a darn good point. I know that women and power don't mix, but doesn't it seem as if the testosterone seems to be distributed mightily in the women's corner? These men politicos are utterly useless, though they may mutter a sane word here and there near election time. Witness McCain.
69 posted on 10/11/2006 10:40:31 PM PDT by ashtanga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pogo101


Limbaugh/Rice 08!
70 posted on 10/11/2006 10:46:22 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
Yep, I agree about Ann for sure.

I watched the Wolf-Wolf / Bill-Bill the Clinton Shill interview. Bill was playing word games during the whole interview and of course "Wolf the Enabler" didn't call him on it a single time. An example; Bill stated that N. Korea did not "build" a nuke during the period of the Clinton administration. Well, obviously, the word "build" implies "completion of". If Wolf were even half way objective he would have asked, "ok, but N. Korea certainly was developing the bomb and "building it" during the Clinton administration", right? Naturally, that question was never asked nor any other questions challenging Richardson's revisionist recollections.
71 posted on 10/11/2006 10:56:10 PM PDT by snoringbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
BULLSEYE Can we talk about important stuff like Foley now?

The enabler for monica's job at the "united. negatives." should send rodney king over there!??!

72 posted on 10/11/2006 10:58:35 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

jeeze she is right on the money here....that is an excellent piece of writing...

HOWEVER

to all fellow freepers...i must say the mandatory pics rule is not been followed...manners freepers...u know the rules...


73 posted on 10/11/2006 11:10:06 PM PDT by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

O'Reilly had some former Clinton stooge on last night and this guy said the United States never sent money to NK. When BOR mentioned the food, reactors, oil, etc; this clown said that was not actual dollars and BOR mentioned dollars. Man, it's like talking to children!

74 posted on 10/12/2006 3:55:47 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Thanks for the pics of Ann. The younger Ann pics I have never seen before. Beautiful young lady and WOW what a mind.


75 posted on 10/12/2006 4:35:19 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

Link to You Tube: Starring Halfbright and Horney/Stinky Kim Che in Clinton's Latest Glow Job

76 posted on 10/12/2006 7:07:24 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

Funny graphic...


77 posted on 10/12/2006 6:22:00 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Thank you Czar!


78 posted on 10/13/2006 11:41:39 AM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Were they drinking Korean goat piss?


79 posted on 10/15/2006 9:35:27 PM PDT by xc1427
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson