Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton's Latest Glow Job [Ann Coulter]
AnnCoulter.com ^ | October 11, 2006 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 10/11/2006 3:17:13 PM PDT by pogo101

With the Democrats' full-throated moralizing of late, I'm almost tempted to vote for them — although perhaps "full-throated" is the wrong phrase to use with regard to Democrats and sex scandals. The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer to talk about anything other than national security.

Unfortunately for them, the psychotic Kim Jong Il seems to be setting off nukes, raising the embarrassing issue of the Clinton administration's 1994 "peace" deal with North Korea.

At least with former Rep. Mark Foley, you could say the Democrats' hypocritical grandstanding was just politics. But in the case of North Korea, Democrats are resorting to bald-faced lies.

Current New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration official Bill Richardson has been on tour, bragging about the groundbreaking Clinton administration negotiations with North Korea — keeping his fingers crossed that no one has access to news from 1994.

In 1994, the Clinton administration got a call from Jimmy Carter — probably collect — who was with the then-leader of North Korea, saying: "Hey, Kim Il Sung is a total stud, and I've worked out a terrific deal. I'll give you the details later."

Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished.

Under the terms of the "agreed framework," we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes — more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return, they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn't difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.

Yes, you read that right: North Korea promised not to develop nukes, and we showed how much we trusted them by agreeing to no weapons inspections for five years.

The famed "allies," whom liberals claim they are so interested in pleasing, went ballistic at this cave-in to North Korea. Japan and South Korea — actual allies, unlike France and Germany — were furious. Even Hans Blix thought we were being patsies.

If you need any more evidence that it was a rotten deal, The New York Times hailed it as "a resounding triumph."

At the time, people like William Safire were screaming from the rooftops that allowing North Korea to escape weapons inspections for five years would "preclude a pre-emptive strike by us if North Korea, in the next U.S. president's administration, breaks its agreement to freeze additional bomb-making."

And then on Oct. 17, 2002 — under a new administration, you'll note — The New York Times reported on the front page, so you couldn't have missed it: "Confronted by new American intelligence, North Korea has admitted that it has been conducting a major clandestine nuclear weapons development program for the past several years."

So when it comes to North Korea, I believe the Democrats might want to maintain a discreet silence, lest anyone ask, "Hey, did you guys do anything with North Korea?"

But by Richardson's lights, the only reason Kim Jong Il is testing nukes is because Bush called him evil. He said, "When you call him axis of evil or a tyrant, you know, he just goes crazy." This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann, not someone who might know people who read newspapers.

Richardson also blames the war in Iraq, bleating that the poor North Koreans feel "that there's too much attention on the Middle East, on Iraq. So it's a cry for attention." If Kim just wanted our attention, he could have started dating Lindsay Lohan. But Richardson says Kim "psychologically feels he's been dissed, that he's not treated with respect."

Damn that Bush! If only he had ignored the crazy Muslims and dedicated himself into sending flowers (and more nuclear reactors!) to North Korea, we could be actively helping Kim develop his nukes like the Clinton administration did.

As Richardson said, Kim "wants us to negotiate with him directly, as we did in the Clinton administration."

To go on TV and propose negotiating with North Korea like Clinton did without ever mentioning that North Korea cheated on that agreement before the ink was dry would be like denouncing American aggression against Japan in 1942 and neglecting to mention Pearl Harbor. Anyone who is either that stupid or that disingenuous should not be allowed on TV.

When pressed by CNN's Anderson Cooper about the failed deal, Richardson lied, claiming the 1994 deal prevented the North Koreans from building nukes "for eight years" — i.e., right up until the day The New York Times reported the North Koreans had been developing nukes "for the past several years."

Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce. In fact, he's so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action. Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the "Dear Leader" is an actual pederast. Then we'll at least be able to read his instant messages.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; anncoulter; fauxsexscandal; kimiljong; markfoley; northkorea; presidentclinton; rewritinghistory; sexwhatsex; snowjob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: pogo101

I've always had trouble determining whether the Clinton's hatred classifies them as communists or Nazis. Both seem to change their masks according to circumstances.


21 posted on 10/11/2006 4:06:58 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Consider that nearly half the people you pass on the street meet Lenin's definition of useful idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
"The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer to talk about anything other than national security."

LMAO!!!!

22 posted on 10/11/2006 4:17:33 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Can anyone find out the date we first enacted the "Coulter Rule"?

Just curious.

23 posted on 10/11/2006 4:30:51 PM PDT by JOE6PAK (Beelzebub has a devil put aside for me,for me-for meeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pogo101; Victoria Delsoul
This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann, not someone who might know people who read newspapers.

Paging Keith Olbermann. LOL.

24 posted on 10/11/2006 4:42:50 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
For the Dems to act like every thing in N. Korea was great until President Bush took over is just nuts. Here are links to two docs that shed some light on the subject.

IAEA 1997

US House 1999

25 posted on 10/11/2006 4:44:32 PM PDT by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

right on target


26 posted on 10/11/2006 4:46:18 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

she tells it the way it is


27 posted on 10/11/2006 5:02:06 PM PDT by mickey blue eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
Why is it--that it seems like the only ones with the 'stones' to BLUNTLY 'tell it like it is' are the ladies? (Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham, Mona Charen)

You win, hands down, with this question. How about: Laura and Ann vs. Clinton and Pelosi in '08.

The debates would be historic. We'd finally address the presidential 'gender' issue with a landslide generated by looks and brains that could, quite literally, wipe the Dems off the map for an eternity.

Upside: more fine chicks would gravitate toward using their brains. Downside: I can't think of any at the moment.

28 posted on 10/11/2006 5:10:58 PM PDT by budwiesest ("I'll have the duck with mango sauce,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

Whenever the Clintonistas come out in full force on TV, you know they are trying to hide something.


29 posted on 10/11/2006 5:15:20 PM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

Thanks man!!!!

30 posted on 10/11/2006 5:46:31 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Under the terms of the "agreed framework," we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes — more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return, they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn't difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.

Absolutely criminal!!!!!

31 posted on 10/11/2006 5:51:45 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Bill Richardson = Clinton's butt boy.

Stay home and run your f%&!ing state.

32 posted on 10/11/2006 6:09:06 PM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

33 posted on 10/11/2006 6:09:32 PM PDT by perfect stranger (Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass). "Getting bombed has always struck me as the better option.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JOE6PAK

who cares.....as long as it is enforced!!!!!


34 posted on 10/11/2006 6:47:48 PM PDT by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
President Clinton trusted Kim Il Jong. He got badly betrayed - and its all President Bush's fault!!!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

35 posted on 10/11/2006 6:48:17 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
If someone can convince the Democrats Kim is a Republican they might finally support nuking North Korea.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

36 posted on 10/11/2006 6:49:46 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

The best part about this cartoon - the facial expression on the elephant. I love it.

37 posted on 10/11/2006 6:56:24 PM PDT by WireAndWood (DNC: if it weren't for groupthink we'd have no think at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

I learned a new word from Ann "pederast" a man who commits "pederasty" and that is "sodomy with a boy".

I did not know that!


38 posted on 10/11/2006 6:58:13 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
There's something about this one that I like...

Nothing that couldn't be fixed by turning out the light I guess. She looks hideous in that one to me.
39 posted on 10/11/2006 7:11:49 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; HitmanLV; Army Air Corps; proud_yank
Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce. In fact, he's so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action. Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the "Dear Leader" is an actual pederast. Then we'll at least be able to read his instant messages.

LOLOL! Priceless and right on target.

Of course Kim didn't do anything while Clinton was filling up his coffers with oil, nuclear reactors, and tons of technology. As Ann pointed out, under Clinton's 1994 deal the weapons inspectors were not even allowed to their job for the next 5 years.

I have the feeling the Rats were very disappointed to find out that the plane crash in Manhattan wasn't a terrorist attack. Imagine the ammunition they would've had if this had been an actual terrorist incident.

40 posted on 10/11/2006 7:13:21 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson