Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prost1

He may have a very big problem. If he was off the deed, he was obligated to report a sale of the asset on his tax return. When he got the million bucks, do you suppose he might have filed a tax return claiming capital gains treatment? This could be big time tax fraud for him.


197 posted on 10/11/2006 11:57:04 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
Via Drudge -

Now it is being reported GOP leaders are seekign a probe against Berger for his theft from the archives. They are ratcheting it up!
207 posted on 10/11/2006 12:00:08 PM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
He may have a very big problem. If he was off the deed, he was obligated to report a sale of the asset on his tax return. When he got the million bucks, do you suppose he might have filed a tax return claiming capital gains treatment? This could be big time tax fraud for him.

Complicated financial scandals have NO traction whatsoever - what you typed above is completely incomprehensible to about 99.99% of voters, particularly undecided ones.

Unless Reid is actually indicted or something before the election, this whole scandal is basically irrelevant politically.

229 posted on 10/11/2006 12:04:25 PM PDT by Strategerist (Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
Doug, I think they'll just try to present this as a casual deal between two long-time friends. Harry makes my stomach turn, but I don't think he's that stupid. I hope he is, but I doubt it.
232 posted on 10/11/2006 12:05:04 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland
If he was off the deed, he was obligated to report a sale of the asset on his tax return.

I'm not sure if that's true. If he sold it for exactly what he paid for it, there's no taxable transaction.

I'd like to know if he actually got paid that amount, or whether that's a bogus figure in order to have a non-reportable event.

The problem is that he also got an equity interest in the company which he didn't report. He can't have it both ways. Either he sold the property for no net gain or loss, or he didn't. Subsequent events show that he got 75% of the company in addition to $400,000.

No stock trail, but it doesn't add up. Either he was completely out of the deal for $400k, or, more likely, he never got paid a dime until the million dollar payoff.

Or both, but it doesn't have an innocent explanation in any event.

446 posted on 10/11/2006 3:48:32 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson