Replies

They've done well in judicial nominations.

Too many of the supposedly "conservative" justices have morphed into liberals. It wasn't more than a year ago that they decided that a city can take your business and give it to your competitor.

So you think they can roll back 60 years of socialism in 6? My, you are an optimist.

I think they could do it overnight in a Constitutional convention. Another option we might have is to have a amendment to allow states to secede and/or to have a procedure for ejecting states from the union.

But I don't see the pendulum swinging any other way but left. We are moving towards more socialized medicine. The Supreme Court makes noises about modeling our laws to be consistent with European laws. The borders are still wide open and Bush wants to legalize the illegals which will only invite more. We don't have much time to fool around.

I'm not an optimist. I'm a realist who sees that our options are getting more and more limited.

All right. I agree with you diagnoses. But what is your prescription?

And remember, we have to be practical and realistic. Either a Democrat or a Republican will be President. The House and/or the Senate will be run by Democrats or Republicans.

Further, the number one priority is fiscal restraint, or creeping socialism. The number one priority is national survival. Tight national security against the Islamic world and world-view. Running neck-and-neck, and closely related-immigration. Not whether it is legal, or not, but the amount of it.

Neither Party is good on immigration, though the Rs are marginally better in their rhetoric. But the Dems are an utter disaster on national security and Islam.

OK. What realistic proposal do you have? 'Cause I'm as worried about the country as you are. Maybe more. These are not issues that I just discovered in the last few years; I've thought about them for decades. Although I will admit I severely underestimated the threat of a resurgent Islam.