Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T'wit
Re: >> I don't believe Cheshire, and he was proved to be wrong by the autopsy results.

He certainly was not. I've read the autopsy report three times now, plus browsing. It says nothing of the sort. Drs. Thogmartin and Nelson were at pains to say, in the report and in press conferences, that an autopsy CANNOT determine PVS status. That can only be done with a living patient, and only with repeated examinations over time.

The autopsy report supported PVS. The diagnosis of PVS was made by other docs over many years. Terri never changed. The autopsy report determined that she was blind for a long time and if you say Cheshire examined her and he said she follows objects, then he's either a liar, or totally incompetent.

170 posted on 10/12/2006 4:40:10 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
>> if you say Cheshire examined her and he said she follows objects, then he's either a liar, or totally incompetent.

I didn't say that. I told you Cheshire was not permitted to examine her. It was your doc, Ronald Cranford, who said that, in the course of his exam. It was videotaped. So, was Cranford lying? Or incompetent?

182 posted on 10/12/2006 5:14:33 PM PDT by T'wit (It is not possible to "go too far" criticizing liberals. No matter what you say, they're worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson