[T'wit]

>> if you say Cheshire examined her and he said she follows objects, then he's either a liar, or totally incompetent.

I didn't say that. I told you Cheshire was not permitted to examine her. It was your doc, Ronald Cranford, who said that, in the course of his exam. It was videotaped. So, was Cranford lying? Or incompetent?

[spunkets]

Re: if you say Cheshire examined her and he said she follows objects, then he's either a liar, or totally incompetent.

" I didn't say that. I told you Cheshire was not permitted to examine her. It was your doc, Ronald Cranford, who said that, in the course of his exam. It was videotaped. So, was Cranford lying? Or incompetent?"

Somewhere in the posts above it looks like there was a claim that said Cheshire was given an hour, or 2 with Terri during the time she was taken off the tube. I saw the video cut from Cranford's exam. Cranford made an off the cuff comment during his exam, that was something like, "there see that, she does follow some." The cut was no good, because the full exam showed Terri was not responding and that's what Cranford's findings were. She was not responding to visual, or auditory stimuli. The full exam showed that what appeared to be a response, was merely coincidental. That's what Cranford testified to in court.