Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sending secret messages over public internet lines can take place with new technique
Eurekalert ^ | 10-Oct-2006 | Colleen Morrison

Posted on 10/10/2006 11:15:52 AM PDT by Teflonic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Izzy Dunne

What tower?


21 posted on 10/10/2006 11:54:43 AM PDT by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
"This is old stuff. For instance, properly trained observers can detect the tower in this picture:"

Hmmm...for some of us, finding the tower is as difficult as trying to figure Skanamaru out.

The inside of old Toshiba COCOM Affair (Troll reads a book)
http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-bloggers/1634861/posts
22 posted on 10/10/2006 11:55:40 AM PDT by familyop ("he died for rodeo horse on Jul 25, 1987." - - skanamaru)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

is this "spread spectrum"?


23 posted on 10/10/2006 11:59:52 AM PDT by Mark Felton ("Wisdom is supreme...and though it cost all you have, get understanding" -- Proverbs 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
In short, only works in the lab.

No, I dont get that read. You need a form of matched filter but that's software. You use a pseudo random code to encode the signal and at the other end a matched filter (can be hardware or just software depending of the speed/bandwidth needs) which is properly seeded with the same pseudo random code sequence can pluck out the correct signal componenets from where they were buried. This is done all the time with spread spectrum radios, radars, etc. I admit I havent read the paper but from the article description this sounds like basic spread spectrum technology applied to a fiber optic channel. Different noise characteristics than the atmosphere, which is probably why this is considered novel, but the technique is well established and in use all over.

Interestingly, Spread Spectrum was first patented by Hedy Lamarr (the actress!) in the early 1940s.

24 posted on 10/10/2006 12:01:30 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic
YAWWWWWN!

I built an equivalent system 20 years ago that used LEDs. I demonstrated it to several appropropriate potential customers but for a variety of reasons (some valid), it never got past the "interesting but..." stage.

25 posted on 10/10/2006 12:03:15 PM PDT by nevergiveup (Locals say "puh-TUCK-it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Wasting massive amounts of bandwidth.

Is this a great country or what?

I know that nice clean looking wholesome HEALTHY gal just HAS to vote Conservative, right? ;


26 posted on 10/10/2006 12:03:57 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
You need a form of matched filter but that's software. You use a pseudo random code to encode the signal and at the other end a matched filter

I used truly random noise and a little hardware. No software or careful filtering needed.

27 posted on 10/10/2006 12:07:17 PM PDT by nevergiveup (Locals say "puh-TUCK-it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Thanks for the trip down Mammary Lane....


28 posted on 10/10/2006 12:11:27 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dracian

You think all messages into America from S.A., Jordan, Syria, and Iran are by word of mouth?


29 posted on 10/10/2006 12:12:37 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nevergiveup
I used truly random noise

If it's pseudo random, both sides can generate the same sequence and thus stay synchronized. How do you randomly encode the signal (really randomly) and get it back? If it is true random data, by definition it would be impossible for both sender and receiver to have the same sequence. I suppose you could use truly random data to encode a signal for recording as a rudimentary form of encryption as long as you saved the random sequence to later reconstruct (as the key) but I dont know how you could do it in a comms system unless perhaps you use static random data which each side has recorded.

30 posted on 10/10/2006 12:15:27 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Wasting massive amounts of bandwidth.

Actually, I think the opposite is true. In radar theory, if you use signals encoded appropriately you can greatly decrease the power you transmit. The reason is that it is a lot easier to extract the signal from the noise in the returns due to what is called the integration imprvement factor which results from the use of a known code in the system. In fact it is so much easier that the signal can be made much smaller and still be found. I would think that in a fiber channel with fixed capacity, the use of smaller signals which utilize this same integration improvement to pull them out would allow much more efficient use of the bandwidth.

31 posted on 10/10/2006 12:21:35 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
The only problem is that in my experience in building DWDM networks, most optical filters are hardware based and designed to perform only one or two functions. Either they filter as a straight db filter (an attempt to eliminate the noise level) or they are "frequency" filters (only allowing a specific chromatic range through... or both. From my read on the article, it would appear that either type of filter is very likely to inhibit the proper operation of the optical network. Further, in optical repeating devices or devices that provide the translation from optical to electrical and then regen the signal out the optical interface, would also require special changes to allow for these signals to pass.

But... I have not tested this at all so it might work. But the disclaimer about the filters would have me on the pessimistic side.
32 posted on 10/10/2006 12:25:02 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK; Grampa Dave
Interesting discussion
by folks wishing they were able to do this.
of one secret writing method.
Reading between the lines in white doesn't add a bit of protection from us though.
33 posted on 10/10/2006 12:35:21 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Everyone keep clam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Maybe we can ask if she could give directions to the nearest bar?

34 posted on 10/10/2006 12:40:25 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Everyone keep clam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Tower?
What "Tower?"

Have you got another test that I could try?


35 posted on 10/10/2006 12:50:28 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Tower?
What "Tower?"

Have you got another test I could try?
This one is too hard.


36 posted on 10/10/2006 12:51:26 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

=Marking article=


37 posted on 10/10/2006 12:53:51 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Dang Verizon wireless connection!


38 posted on 10/10/2006 12:54:30 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

You didn't say anything wrong but that's not how I did it. Sorry and don't take it personnel, but since it has been so long and since I have already talked all I want to talk about it (to people with $'s) I am of the age that I'd rather concentrate on reply's from IzzyDunne and ASA Vet.


39 posted on 10/10/2006 1:31:40 PM PDT by nevergiveup (Locals say "puh-TUCK-it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Could she even stand up without her hand on that tree?


40 posted on 10/10/2006 2:04:00 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson