Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: blogblogginaway
2 posted on
10/09/2006 7:53:53 PM PDT by
digger48
To: blogblogginaway
oh this is gonna get GOOD!
3 posted on
10/09/2006 7:54:42 PM PDT by
BladeLWS
To: blogblogginaway
To: blogblogginaway
U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that seismic readings show that the conventional high explosives used to create a chain reaction in a plutonium-based device went off, but that the blast's readings were shy of a typical nuclear detonation.
This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever - if simply the high explosive trigger goes off, you do NOT get an M 4 range earthquake.
I have very limited confidence in Gertz's sources or competence.
7 posted on
10/09/2006 7:57:58 PM PDT by
Strategerist
(Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
To: blogblogginaway
13 posted on
10/09/2006 8:02:19 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: blogblogginaway
I wonder if this gave them the idea of using explosives to appear like a Nuclear test.
Story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3655613.stm
To: blogblogginaway
I thought that it was just the female that"Faked"an orgasm?
I say we bomb 'em anyway, just because we can.....
18 posted on
10/09/2006 8:04:58 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(American first, conservative second.....Republican a distant third.)
To: blogblogginaway
I read the equivalent of 500 tons of TNT was used.
Trying to impress the world of their new found explosive power has but resulted in a humiliating dud. Its' possible NK had the blast to impress the Iranian scientists present that a nuke blast did occur in the hopes Iran would fall for it and result in Iran percurment of the technology.
I, myself, a'm doubting the nuke blast occurred.
23 posted on
10/09/2006 8:11:49 PM PDT by
TOneocon
To: blogblogginaway; Admin Moderator
Thanks for moving this one to breaking.
28 posted on
10/09/2006 8:28:38 PM PDT by
RobFromGa
(Monthly donors rock!)
To: blogblogginaway
It is possible to make a lower yield device.
Davy Crockett (nuclear device)
"..The M-388 round used a version of the W54 warhead, a very small sub-kiloton fission device. The Mk-54 weighed about 51 lb (23 kg), with a selectable yield of 10 or 20 tons (very close to the minimum practical size and yield for a fission warhead). The complete round weighed 76 lb (34.5 kg). It was 31 in. (78.7 cm) long with a diameter of 11 in. (28 cm) at its widest point; a subcaliber piston at the back of the shell was actually inserted into the launcher's barrel for firing.."
To: blogblogginaway
Maybe Rove suggested the blast be downplayed, so that Kim will test all his nukes underground and run out!
31 posted on
10/09/2006 8:32:04 PM PDT by
Solamente
(Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
To: blogblogginaway
The Film Actor's Guild is deeply disturbed
34 posted on
10/09/2006 8:34:37 PM PDT by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: blogblogginaway
It depends upon what the meaning of "nuclear" is......
35 posted on
10/09/2006 8:36:05 PM PDT by
Wil H
To: blogblogginaway
Nucrear Exprosion? Reary?
To: blogblogginaway
Oh, OK. We do not need any response now. Nighty nite.
Is the sarcasm tag needed?
37 posted on
10/09/2006 8:39:43 PM PDT by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
To: blogblogginaway
I'd be a little cautious:
-past underground tests have appeared smaller on seismograph readings than they actually were.
-the russians should not be looked at as an entirely non-credible source... they know a lot about underground testing and its results.
-if it was a failure, we are still likely to see further attempts.
-worst option could be that they have a small yield weapon that could fit on a missile in their inventory.
They have been pumping money into this for years... it's not as hard to accomplish as it was when we did it. It's highly likely that if this failed, they will still succeed if not forceably stopped.
38 posted on
10/09/2006 8:40:14 PM PDT by
nwctwx
(Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
To: blogblogginaway
This is gonna make the Chia Pet go crazy. He might go critical mass all by himself!
To: blogblogginaway
"U.S. intelligence agencies say, based on preliminary indications, that North Korea did not produce its first nuclear blast yesterday, That's what we thought, but was it big enough to be nookyuler?
44 posted on
10/09/2006 8:51:23 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(John Murtha: the only Marine Colonel who can't find Okinawa on a map.)
To: blogblogginaway
If true this could explain reports of a possible second test. Mini-Me is going to keep trying until he's not so ronery anymore.
46 posted on
10/09/2006 8:54:18 PM PDT by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson