Skip to comments.
US Democrats lead after sex scandal
Herald Sun ^
| 10 October 2006
Posted on 10/09/2006 6:23:16 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Aussie Dasher
Shouldn't that be non-sex non-scandal
41
posted on
10/09/2006 8:09:08 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(Monthly donors rock!)
To: stockstrader
I wish I could argue with that.
42
posted on
10/09/2006 8:30:39 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Want to find a Mosque? Get your self a bomb sniffing dog.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Anyone see the guy on O'Reilly who claimed to have "outted" Foley. He says he is going to release more names in the coming weeks..
43
posted on
10/09/2006 8:33:13 PM PDT
by
pnz1
To: 1035rep
2004 General Election Results: House +3 GOP / Senate +4 GOP In case you are not aware of it, the election was held in NOVEMBER. A month is an eternity in a campaign so why are you quoting polls from two or three months before the election?
44
posted on
10/09/2006 11:11:15 PM PDT
by
Dave S
To: Cogadh na Sith
It was a sex scandal with no sex and no scandal. It was child molestation with no children and no molestation Precisely. . .
. . .and the damning non-event is already named. . .'Foley Gate'.
Should be. . .'Folley Gate'; for everyone, involved.
45
posted on
10/09/2006 11:12:56 PM PDT
by
cricket
(Live Liberal free. . .or suffer their consequences. . .SAVE THE TERRORISTS! VOTE DEMOCRAT. . .)
To: Dave S
It would be ridiculous for you to think that the results change that much in a couple months.
46
posted on
10/09/2006 11:15:05 PM PDT
by
1035rep
To: All
Have the events of the past 24 hours negated Foley as an issue?
47
posted on
10/09/2006 11:17:10 PM PDT
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Dave S
NBC/WSJ 9/17-19: 42 (GOP) - 46 (DUm) - 12 (undecided) +4 DUm
48
posted on
10/09/2006 11:18:08 PM PDT
by
1035rep
To: All
Those polls are for dates ending the 8th and do not include the nuke/NK factor yet, I am interested in seeing the next round of polls. But really the polls don't matter and it's still early anyway.
49
posted on
10/09/2006 11:18:10 PM PDT
by
LegalEagle61
(You have 2 choices vote republican or whine about how bad the country is when the liberals take over)
To: All
Who can this possibly effect accept the district he operated in? Nationally it means nothing.
To: Aussie Dasher
Wonder how the Democrats feel now that they've gotten their biggest bump of the season from demagoguing people's disgust at homosexual hijinks. They must be
proud!
It won't stick, and GOP candidates will be the ones getting bumps. Booming economy, low gas prices.
To: TheLion
The polls are part of the DNC agenda, carried by the MSM, and fooling no one.
Just a month ago the same media outlets were spewing the same illogic. Before Foley!
52
posted on
10/10/2006 4:06:08 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
To: 1035rep
I remember those polls from 2004 as well, and my first thought was BS. Here is what the meter is doing today.
53
posted on
10/10/2006 5:14:24 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(The media and the democrats are the biggest supporters of the terrorists.)
To: 1035rep
If it makes you feel good believe it. Dont blame me on Nov 8.
54
posted on
10/10/2006 6:58:53 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: Aussie Dasher
Sex scandal? What sex scandal?
If Billy J. back in the news?
55
posted on
10/10/2006 6:59:52 AM PDT
by
ilgipper
To: Dave S
What is there not to believe? This is the election predictions and the results of 2004. The polls were clearly off by a long shot. That's a fact.
56
posted on
10/10/2006 8:49:47 AM PDT
by
1035rep
To: Cogadh na Sith
It was also a criminal act without the crime.
57
posted on
10/10/2006 8:51:32 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: 1035rep
The polls were clearly off by a long shot. That's a fact. Why dont you stick with the polls done the weekend before the election?
58
posted on
10/10/2006 10:47:35 AM PDT
by
Dave S
To: Dave S
You'll be seeing those soon. Much of the same and I'll be sure to ping you to the post.
59
posted on
10/10/2006 10:49:14 AM PDT
by
1035rep
To: Aussie Dasher
Okay, let me see if I can make some sense of this.
Because of the war in Iraq, Bush has completely polarized the voting population in the United States. Or, at least, that is what the demoRats were saying a few weeks ago.
Now, because of a sex scandal in Congress, a vast undecided middle is switching their vote from Republican to demoRat.
Huh?
That's as absurd as their other effort to confuse the issue, which was, because conservative voters were upset with Bush acting like a demoRat, those conservatives were going to vote for the real thing; an avowed socialist running as a demoRat.
No wonder the demoRats can't enunciate their political position. It's completely contradictory, much as their addled thinking.
The only thing that I'm assured of is that the demoRats will point to all of these polls as proof that voter fraud kept them from winning, quite possibly to the extent of challenging the outcomes of all future elections in the courts where they have a distinct advantage.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson