Yeah, that sounds more like the reaction you would get if it wasn't working. If it was hitting hard, you'd think that would argue in favor of keeping it in place.
If their supposed reason for cancelling it is that it's hurting black business people, why don't they just change it to a boycott of WHITE owned businesses in SC?
But that would be discriminating. LOL
Sounds good in theory but what about the white owned businesses that employ black cashiers, black bag boys, black waitresses/waiters, janitors, drivers, maids, desk clerks, and so on and so on. When those businesses are hit, then layoffs are layoffs. That's not going to effect just white people but all people who are employed by white people.
Buncha dummies, they should have picked a state that had no black owned businesses or employed black people. Fortunately SC has thrived during the "boycott" so if some start up business hasn't done well, she might want to find another excuse for her failure.