Sounds good in theory but what about the white owned businesses that employ black cashiers, black bag boys, black waitresses/waiters, janitors, drivers, maids, desk clerks, and so on and so on. When those businesses are hit, then layoffs are layoffs. That's not going to effect just white people but all people who are employed by white people.
Buncha dummies, they should have picked a state that had no black owned businesses or employed black people. Fortunately SC has thrived during the "boycott" so if some start up business hasn't done well, she might want to find another excuse for her failure.
I know. I don't think it's a good idea, and I wouldn't choose whom to do business with on the basis of race in the first place, but I'll bet the NAACP would (and I do think they should have the legal right to do that if they want to, even if it's stupid).