Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Westbrook; Sacajaweau
At the time, we were the only power with nukes and could have put a very swift end to Mao and his minions and his surrogates in North Korea.

Don't get too carried away, wouldashouldacoulda.

At that time, Stalin would've had to have backed Mao completely. He didn't want Imperial Japan approaching his border in the first place, he certainly wouldn't mind throwing more bodies to keep a nuclear USA of the continent.

The "greatest generation" was tired of that war, and wasn't going to have it all out with Uncle Joe.

And in the end, then what? Perhaps if we had unified Korea at that time, they would have had 50 years to becomes a socialist "ally" the likes, of, say...France?

Who are the only friends we have in Europe? The East Bloc that we also didn't let Patton free.

108 posted on 10/09/2006 7:00:11 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine; Westbrook; Sacajaweau

If Truman hadn't "lost" china in the first place the discussion would be academic.


133 posted on 10/09/2006 7:04:11 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Face it, every empire comes to an end, and ours is on the down hill slope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson