Posted on 10/08/2006 10:00:47 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
I wonder what those other 40% are? I guess it all depends on what the meaning of "speak of" is.
In October 21 1958, a group of castrist rebelds seize a DC-3 of Cubana de Aviación with 14 persons. The airship flew for the province of Oriente and was obliged to land in a trail dominated by the Guerrillas. According to the revolutionaries, with this hicjacking they want receive the attention of the United States Government, so that it did not send more weapons to the General Fulgencio Batista.
In November 1, 1958, the guerrillas hickjack another airship with 20 persons, in the route Miami - Havana - Varadero. This airplane Viscount-755 is diverted to Oriente near Holguín, and the hicjackers obliged the crew to landed in a trail of the United Fruit Company, near the Preston town. But cannot land in this trail by their reduced dimensions, they began to fly in circles in the night, they could not see the trail. When see that remained few fuel, they decided to land, erring the trail for 3 kilometers, and falling to the sea, in the Bay of Nipe. Dying 17 persons, and 3 passengers remained injured, but alive. The guerrillas asked excuses and indicated that their intention was that US did not deliver more weapons to the General Batista, besides they not were done responsible for the action of some isolated revolutionaries.
November 5, 1958, the guerrillas return to operate and hijacking a DC-3 of Cubana (flight 482), piloted by Assembling Pïedra, that flew the route Manzanillo to Holguín. There was 25 passengers and 3 crew. The airplane lands in the rebelds zone.
If you are speaking of only US hijackings why cite your source which gives global hijackings -when was the first US hijacking? Not in 1947.
Agreed!
"None of these people quoted here had any experience in dealing with Islam. "
I think that their solution would have been to forcibly deport all muslims from the colonies or states.
CID actually confiscated a small hex-wrench (like 1/2" size) that I had been carrying around on several prior flights from MIA and FLL..
As compared to dozens per year from 1968 to 1973, the total number for those years being 364. The numbers slacked off a bit after 1973 mostly due to (get this) an large increase in the number of armed air marshalls.
Wow. People with guns on airplanes makes flying safer. Who'da thunk it?
So, pre-1968 not that much to speak of. Some yes, but a drop in a bucket compared to post 1968.
"So, pre-1968 not that much to speak of. "
How'd I guess that you'd move the goal posts?
What goal posts?
I said that pre-1968 there weren't any hijackings to speak of.
That's a euphemism for "not many."
I'm sorry if you're having trouble understanding. I can use smaller words if you like.
No, it's late. Sorry if I ruffled any feathers.
Sorry if I responded too harshly.
Utterly amazing responses. Elsewhere I'm discussing with a correspondent that sees no infringement of the 2A!
Good people should be armed where they will.
Good people should be armed where they will.
How do you only arm "good people?"
BS! Blackbird.
None of these people quoted here had any experience with commercial aviation.
I don't think the procedures are invasive at all.
In fact, I feel more at ease knowing the TSA is taking these threats seriously and reducing the chances that the plane I or my loved ones are flying in.
God Bless the TSA
Dead people from up to 200 years ago is why this republic exists, buster.
Anyhow, the "not just any old clear plastic bag but only OUR kind of clear plastic bag" rule sounds like a bureaucracy in the early stages of dealing with a new problem. TSA in general was that way in the early years following the 9/11 attacks, then it eased some of the sillier rules.
That only works if you check your bags. The last 3 times I checked my bags on an airliner, my bags got lost. I did get them back, however, twice it was the following day, and once it was 2 days later. I figured that "the third time was the charm," and only take carry on now. Thankfully, I don't travel often anymore. But I've come to the decision that if you've got something that you absolutely, positively need to have immediately at your destination, and you will need to check it through on the airlines, well, that's why G-d invented FedEx!
Mark
What I want to know is if they confiscated his toothpaste, did they also confiscate the clear, non-approved bag? And just why is it that one clear bag is approved, and another isn't? And how is it that taking deadly toothpaste from a non-approved, clear bag, and putting into a government approved clear-bag, purchased at the gift shop, renders that deadly toothpaste safe for travel?
Mark
I would imagine that some manner of uniformity speeds the process along. Having seen packages slide into the carousel tied with rope, bungy cords and kite string, it isn't hard to imagine some nitwit using a 50 gallon clear plastic bag for a tube of toothpaste and a lipstick.
WOW! Now that's a revelation. Of course it has nothing to do with, they didn't know Islam, does it!? Blackbird.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.