Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hating the TSA
Muth's Truths ^ | 10/8/2006 | Chuck Muth

Posted on 10/08/2006 10:00:47 PM PDT by Dick Bachert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
Years ago when the metal detectors went into the airports (didn't THEY work wonderfully well on 9-11???), I predicted that this was but the FIRST step toward desensitizing the Ameican people to the gradual erosion of their rights by government. I also predicted that it would, in time, lead to deeper and deeper erosion to the point where anyone who questioned what was going on would be considered -- if not an enemy of the state -- one who would bear "watching" by a power grasping bureaucracy.

Chuck Muth has described the experiences now commonplace in our daily lives.

I can safely -- and very sadly -- predict that the abuses will continue and grow, our "safety" will NOT be enhanced (I don't think it was ever really believed by those in power that it would be) and the America -- the IDEA, NOT the PLACE-- in which many of us grew up will wither and die.

And in the words of men far more learned and wiser than I, it will not have been murdered: It will have died by suicide.

"...the natural tendency of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield...let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." Thomas Jefferson

"...the idea of liberty must grow weak in the hearts of men before it can be killed at the hands of tyrants." T.Jefferson

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt The Younger in the House of Commons, 18 Nov. 1783

“Those who would trade their freedom for a little security deserve neither freedom nor security.” Ben Franklin

"Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; if it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it."— Judge Learned Hand, 1944.

1 posted on 10/08/2006 10:00:47 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

None of these people quoted here had any experience in dealing with Islam.

My sense is that most Libertarians appear to be clueless as well, government efficiency not withstanding.


2 posted on 10/08/2006 10:04:45 PM PDT by misterrob (Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

We went through Dulles security and Lindbergh last week with two carry ons and two checked bags and things moved quick, it wasn't a big deal at all. They handled everyone professionally and swiftly. Just put the liquids in your check in bags. It was a five to ten minute process.
Everything we took with us we came home with. It just rides in a different part of the plane.


3 posted on 10/08/2006 10:14:53 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert; Doug Fiedor; Jeff Head; SLB; logos

bump!!


4 posted on 10/08/2006 10:18:44 PM PDT by the irate magistrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
None of these people quoted here had any experience in dealing with Islam.

And how does requiring people to use government-approved sandwich bags for their toothpaste in any way relate to dealing with Islam?

5 posted on 10/08/2006 10:33:13 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

As a frequent flyer I've never had a problem. Though I do like those little TVs they have on JetBlue.


6 posted on 10/08/2006 10:35:33 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

I travel to Europe and Asia every 3 months and take dozens of domestic flights a year. I never had a problem with TSA and never personally saw anyone who had a problem with TSA. While it may be a false sense of security, there is a least some security with the TSA. I would never set foot on a commercial airliner today if there was no TSA to screen the passengers. Don't blame TSA for terrorists. That's like blaming the weatherman for the weather. If you have a better solution, then let's hear about it.

Funny how the most vocal complainers are those that fly maybe once every 5 years - or who never set foot on a plane at all, but they think they know what is best for the millions of us who fly every day.


7 posted on 10/08/2006 10:38:10 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supercat
The point I was making is how libertarians (and Muth is one of them) are so very quick to break out the loss of liberty rap whenever government does anything to try and provide security for people. While government bureaucrats are not that effective in coming up with workable solutions to real world problems and it is always fair game to mock their lame efforts, people want to grouse about their freedoms being impinged upon and quote dead people from up to 200 plus years ago as a way to sound relevant.
8 posted on 10/08/2006 10:40:36 PM PDT by misterrob (Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Freedom is good, m'kay? But civil disobedience at airport security is the wrong move. Constructive suggestions properly channeled are an option we have.

I'm not trying to flame you or anything. I guess you wanted reactions. I agree, flying sucks big time.


9 posted on 10/08/2006 10:42:38 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell

I've found the smaller airports to be less a hassle - flying out of Westchester airport this weekend was a breeze, and the TSA at security were friendly and chatted with everyone - and compared to the bleak, robotic TSa at SFO, or JFK, a breath of fresh air.

I've compared notes with lots of friends and family, and the number of verboten items gotten through outnumber the items seized or found. Clearly, this method of banning items like liquids and lighters and tweezers is closing the barn door after the horses have escaped, and that the fight against terrorism lies elsewhere - if they are determined, they WILL blow up a plane, and there's not much we can do - if we the public are aware of the items being banned, then it's too late, and undoubtedly the terrorists have moved on to more exciting and un-thought of ways of doing it.

The more I think about it, the more I think the TSA and their edicts and bans are simply public red flags to distract from the other glaring issues, like the borders.


10 posted on 10/08/2006 10:43:43 PM PDT by ByDesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
May God have mercy on the political souls of the idiot Republicans who brought this plague of airport security federal bureaucrats upon us.

Seemm to remember it was the Democrats who howled about creating DHS etc. So if he doesn't like TSA, what is his alternative suggestion ?
"PC" says we can't possibly profile the passengers themselves which is of course the obvious thing to do so what's the alternative ?

11 posted on 10/08/2006 10:44:57 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
None of these people quoted here had any experience in dealing with Islam

Never heard of the Barbary Pirates, eh?

L

12 posted on 10/08/2006 10:45:40 PM PDT by Lurker (islam is not a religion. It's the new face of Fascism in our time. We ignore it at our peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign

My sense of the thing is that they're doing the best they can with the resources available. I can't fault them for that.

Except for a few long lines, I've never had a problem. And the vast majority of TSA employees I've encountered seem dedicated and competent.

And yeah, I agree, smaller airports are better, but often require a longer cab ride to the destination.


13 posted on 10/08/2006 10:47:41 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Please. Within the context of this article do not try to plead your case that the restrictions on the freedoms of American citizens is necessary for the safety of all. The TSA is the most incompetent bureaucracy ever devised by man.


14 posted on 10/08/2006 11:24:05 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

OK, so when exactly did the Utopia this guy alludes to exist?


15 posted on 10/08/2006 11:28:00 PM PDT by PC99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign
Actually, as someone who travels all the time around the Midwest. The "smaller" airports have more of a hassle. Granted the lines are longer at the larger airports. However, flying regularly out of ORD and MDW, they move things pretty quickly. However, flying out of for instance CID or OMA, you need your boarding pass to the first agent. Then for some reason you need to show it again to a second person. Approximately every 5th person has to undergo a "laptop check" which involves taking samples and doing who know what with them..also more likely to have bags searched because of suspicious object, which turns out to be a radio or a battery.

The gels and liquid ban is absolutely ridiculous. However, I personally liked it because since passengers could not bring drinks on the plane, the usually did not bring their food to eat also..one of my pet peeves.

16 posted on 10/08/2006 11:43:09 PM PDT by Fast Ed97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PC99
OK, so when exactly did the Utopia this guy alludes to exist?

Pre-1968 when you could take a gun onto a plane.

And prior to which there weren't any hijackings to speak of.

What a coincidence, eh?

More guns means less crime. On aircraft too.

17 posted on 10/08/2006 11:58:14 PM PDT by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Off topic, but the DMV far surpasses the TSA for incompetence


18 posted on 10/09/2006 12:23:25 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Knitebane
Wrong on pre-'69 hijacks, but to heck with facts.
19 posted on 10/09/2006 12:30:23 AM PDT by endthematrix (“Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
Since 1947, 60% of hijackings have been refugee escapes. In 1968-69 there was a massive rise in the number of hijackings.

Aw darn. There go those "fact" thingies screwing up your reasoned debate.

20 posted on 10/09/2006 12:42:28 AM PDT by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson