Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: durasell

I've found the smaller airports to be less a hassle - flying out of Westchester airport this weekend was a breeze, and the TSA at security were friendly and chatted with everyone - and compared to the bleak, robotic TSa at SFO, or JFK, a breath of fresh air.

I've compared notes with lots of friends and family, and the number of verboten items gotten through outnumber the items seized or found. Clearly, this method of banning items like liquids and lighters and tweezers is closing the barn door after the horses have escaped, and that the fight against terrorism lies elsewhere - if they are determined, they WILL blow up a plane, and there's not much we can do - if we the public are aware of the items being banned, then it's too late, and undoubtedly the terrorists have moved on to more exciting and un-thought of ways of doing it.

The more I think about it, the more I think the TSA and their edicts and bans are simply public red flags to distract from the other glaring issues, like the borders.


10 posted on 10/08/2006 10:43:43 PM PDT by ByDesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ByDesign

My sense of the thing is that they're doing the best they can with the resources available. I can't fault them for that.

Except for a few long lines, I've never had a problem. And the vast majority of TSA employees I've encountered seem dedicated and competent.

And yeah, I agree, smaller airports are better, but often require a longer cab ride to the destination.


13 posted on 10/08/2006 10:47:41 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ByDesign
Actually, as someone who travels all the time around the Midwest. The "smaller" airports have more of a hassle. Granted the lines are longer at the larger airports. However, flying regularly out of ORD and MDW, they move things pretty quickly. However, flying out of for instance CID or OMA, you need your boarding pass to the first agent. Then for some reason you need to show it again to a second person. Approximately every 5th person has to undergo a "laptop check" which involves taking samples and doing who know what with them..also more likely to have bags searched because of suspicious object, which turns out to be a radio or a battery.

The gels and liquid ban is absolutely ridiculous. However, I personally liked it because since passengers could not bring drinks on the plane, the usually did not bring their food to eat also..one of my pet peeves.

16 posted on 10/08/2006 11:43:09 PM PDT by Fast Ed97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson