Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Filmmaker captures toll road opposition
San Antonio Express-News ^ | October 6, 2006 | Patrick Driscoll

Posted on 10/07/2006 5:51:18 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The more William Molina heard about toll road plans, the more outraged he got, until finally he picked up his camera and did what he does best.

Molina spent the past several months shooting more than 40 hours of footage at public meetings in San Antonio and nearby towns, talked to activists, tried to talk to toll road advocates and spliced together a film documenting what he says is a nexus of tremendous change.

"I just wanted to capture history," the veteran filmmaker said. "One day we're going to look back at this and say, how did this happen."

"Truth Be Tolled," which debuted last week and is available for free showings, offers Molina's take on why this is happening, but mostly it's a series of people from all walks of life, shown up close to reveal every twitch of emotion as they voice fear, anger and confusion.

"The most powerful thing about the film were the individual voices," said Char Miller, director of urban studies at Trinity University, who sponsored a screening there Thursday.

The documentary, about and hour and 45 minutes long, treads quickly through massive state tolling laws passed in recent years, the new policies to toll every new highway lane possible with the help of private companies that would reap profits in return.

Now toll roads are planned in cities around Texas, including more than 70 miles in San Antonio. And work is under way to develop the Trans-Texas Corridor, a 4,000-mile network of toll lanes, railways and utility lines in swaths up to a quarter-mile wide through rural areas.

State officials say that to solve traffic congestion it's better to use tolls rather than raise gas taxes to build more roads and complete them faster.

In the film, activists and elected officials bucking the shift to tolling said government has simply figured out a way to squeeze lots of money out of motorists, and they point out that traffic congestion is needed on free roads to make tollways profitable.

In public meetings throughout the state this summer, most speakers opposed toll plans.

"These are real people dealing with real issues, and the film just carries out their voices," Molina said.

Molina, a Trinity University graduate who spent 15 years shooting movies and television shows in Hollywood and has done films for the Discovery and History channels, said he tried to interview officials with several agencies as well as elected leaders who favor tolls.

None agreed, he said.

"From what he was giving me, he already had his answers," Texas Department of Transportation spokeswoman Gaby Garcia explained. "He wasn't going to have a fair discussion or a balanced discussion on the issues."

Trinity students Fletcher Rhoads and Emily Bower said the film tweaked their interest.

"It was more emotionally driven," Bower said.

"Which is fine," Rhoads said.

"But," Bower added, "I feel like I need to do research on my own to form my own opinion."

To find out more about the documentary and where it's being shown, go to the Web at TruthBeTolled.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: carolestrayhorn; contributions; cuespookymusic; donations; elections; goodhair; govgoodhair; grandma; onetoughgrandma; politics; rickperry; salcostello; texas; tollroads; transtexascorridor; truthbetolled; ttc; ttc35; tx; txdot; williammolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: BobL

Likewise, if you refuse to understand everything I've written so far.


61 posted on 10/08/2006 10:57:15 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Let's see - you're basically saying that a $200 cash incentive will not be a factor in checking the routing that a truck driver chooses to take - particularly if he has time to kill at the destination.

You may want to look at how much independents make and then reconsider.


62 posted on 10/08/2006 11:45:59 AM PDT by BobL (http://www.brusselsjournal.com/blog/4556 (here is where the real Europe is going))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BobL

This is just a development plan, not a contract or agreement.



Bingo..... there are no contracts for construct and operation signed at this stage. You can't have a signed contract when the feds and any others that have to sign off prior to construction have done so.

The non compete clause mentioned is going to be in the SH 130 segment 5 & 6 unless they are lying. If lying why make such a statement to the public on their web site?....

What part of the following do you not understand?

http://www.dot.state.tx.us/news/025-2006.htm
TxDOT is currently reviewing comments and input gathered at 54 public hearings this summer along the I-35 corridor. The comments will be addressed in a report to the FHWA, which is expected to determine next summer if studies for TTC-35 will continue to a second phase, or Tier Two level. It is anticipated that it could be four years before a final alignment for TTC-35 could be approved by FHWA.

Work on I-35 continues

“The state’s commitment to expand IH-35 remains intact,” said Behrens. “Everything that TxDOT is working on now and has scheduled over the next 25 years under the traditional gas-tax financed system will continue as planned.”

Widening of the interstate will be costly and alone will not meet future transportation needs. Forty-five percent of all Texans live within 50 miles of I-35 and by 2030, more than 15 million people will live within the corridor. “Congestion on I-35 threatens public safety, the state’s economic vitality and the quality of life for millions of people,” said Behrens.

TxDOT is working to widen a 94-mile segment of I-35 from Georgetown to Hillsboro to a minimum of 3-lanes in each direction. This project will cost $1 billion and will be done in phases using the traditional “pay-as-you go” funding system that depends on fuel taxes. Construction on the final segment is expected to begin in 2011. Although the existing center median will be filled to construct the new single lane in each direction, additional right-of-way will be required for the expansion project, primarily at bridges and interchanges.


63 posted on 10/08/2006 12:24:39 PM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BobL
"Let's put the TTC Plan..........up for a vote.

I have a better idea that I'm sure you will agree with.

Lets have a statewide referendum with 4 transportation packages and the voters will decide which one they want.

The first package would be the TTC as it is.

The second would be revert to pay as you go and raise the gas tax and collect enough money to eventually build the TTC.

The third would be for the state to sell bonds to raise the money to build the roads and have a board/agency oversee everthing. The money to pay off the bonds would be collected by charging a toll on the road.

The fourth would be for the state to sell bonds to raise the money and then build and manage it just like any other road. The money to pay off the bonds would be raised by increasing the gas tax.

If you think that there are others options worthy of the voter's consideration, feel free to add them to the referendum.

64 posted on 10/08/2006 12:39:44 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
"One of the primary contentions against the road is that it will be privately-operated."

this is an area of confusion for me. in Colorado they are converting HOV lanes to toll lanes. If taxes PAID for those lanes, how can they take them away?
also, recently on C-470, a toll road, I noticed state troopers at EVERY overpass. how can state cops patrol a private road ? finally, why would they want to NAZI a road like that. I'm not kidding, I saw at LEAST 15 cop cars on my 20 mile drive. who would want to PAY for a drive like that ??!
65 posted on 10/08/2006 12:56:40 PM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: stompk
I cannot speak for Colorado. My understanding is that, in Texas, no "public" lanes will be converted to "private" use. As a matter of fact, it's not even clear that these non-compete clauses will prevent regular expansion.

In any case, don't fall into the trap of thinking that you "paid" (past tense) for the road, and thus hold some sort of "title" to it . . . in reality, you are "paying" for the road even if you do not use it, and these privately-operated tollroads are an attempt to shift the financial burden away from you onto those that do. Back in the Reagan 80's, this concept was derided by the Left (women and children hardest hit, we are at the mercy of corporate interests, etc.). Now, this concept is derided by the Right for practically the same reasons. Go figure.

66 posted on 10/08/2006 1:09:18 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
I'm cool with all but the first, and providing that the state backs up the bonds on 3&4, so as to not require non-compete clauses. Then we still control our highways.
67 posted on 10/08/2006 1:12:47 PM PDT by BobL (http://www.brusselsjournal.com/blog/4556 (here is where the real Europe is going))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

bump.


68 posted on 10/08/2006 2:52:42 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

That agreement appears to apply to the privately-built portion of SH-130. I don't know whether similar exemptions to non-compete clauses will apply to (the rest of) TTC-35.


69 posted on 10/08/2006 2:59:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

People moan and groan about corporate greed, but government greed seems to be the winner here.


70 posted on 10/08/2006 3:08:33 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I'm not sure that having the state in charge of the toll roads will prevent non-compete clauses. Sections 1 through 4 of SH-130 will be state-run, and I believe I read something to the effect that these sections do have a non-compete clause.


71 posted on 10/08/2006 3:22:03 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BobL

The point was to demonstrate that holding TTC 35 up alone for scrutiny is not valid. This, of course, takes us back to the problem that no one has offered an alternative. Unless you count Grandma's suggestion about double decking and sending all the trucks up around thru Midland.


72 posted on 10/08/2006 4:27:40 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I can't say with certainty, but it would be highly probable that the buffer zone would be the same. There is a reason that the band of possible roadway is located that far away.


73 posted on 10/08/2006 4:31:40 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

said he tried to interview officials with several agencies as well as elected leaders who favor tolls.


None agreed, he said.



Hell No, they didn't! Tollroads are No different than any other tax. You just get to pay it in person.


74 posted on 10/09/2006 3:26:31 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

Why are we always so fast to fall for the old "to build more roads, we have to raise taxes" routine



That's the question of the year! We don't have to accept anything. This is OUR state and if We have control of OUR elected officials, like it was meant to be, OUR money would be spent more wisely.


75 posted on 10/09/2006 3:33:40 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BobL

You wouldn't be 'friends' with that Foley guy, would you?


YOU GO, BOB! Thanks for arguing with the WALL so, I don't have to!


76 posted on 10/09/2006 3:44:42 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WesternPacific
If they want to solve traffic congestion, especially in San Antonio, they should deport all 12-20 million illegals.


I hear that! We took a trip, via SA, to the coast this weekend. We pasted many groups of Mexican citizens, dragging another vehicle, south towards the border, at 55 mph.
77 posted on 10/09/2006 3:51:24 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson