Skip to comments.
From a List to a GOP Civil War? [More Dirty Tricks]
Davidcorn.com ^
| October 06, 2006
| David Corn
Posted on 10/06/2006 11:08:05 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
From a List to a GOP Civil War? Copies of The List (see below) have been sent by gay politicos to a variety of social conservative groups that look to the Republican Party to make their religious right dreams come true. The recipients include the Christian Coalition, Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council, the Alliance for Marriage, Concerned Women of America, the Eagle Forum, and the Southern Baptist Convention. Officials at most of these groups have had something to say about homosexuality and gay rights in the wake of the Mark Foley scandal.
What's the point? The senders--gay people of a non-Republican bent--seem to be hoping to set off a civil war within the GOP, to turn the anti-gay social cons against the GOP's Velvet Mafia. These Washington gays have been seething for years about gay Republican staffers who serve a party that opposes gay rights and that welcomes the support of people who demonize or dehumanize gays and lesbians. "Maybe now the social conservatives will realize one reason why their agenda is stalled on Capitol Hill," says a gay politico. Another says, "The inherent inconsistency of a coalition that shelters both gay loathing 'Christian' conservatives and conservative gays will soon suffer its final rupture."
Will it? We shall see, as the Foley scandal continues to unfold, and The List continues to circulate.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: davidcorn; davidcornhole; foley; foleygate; gay; gop; homosexualagenda; radicalleftists; velvetmafia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: griswold3
Positively sulfuric. :-)
21
posted on
10/06/2006 11:29:07 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: DryFly
The problem with a list, is there is no proof they are gay. The developers of the list are trying to turn us against one another.
22
posted on
10/06/2006 11:29:11 AM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: jrooney
I would walk through a mine field covered in broken glass bare foot with a blind fold on to vote.
I am with you. I volunteered to sit at the poles the entire day from 7AM to 8:30PM. The local GOP will be bringing me lunch and dinner.... I will have a list of names of people who said they will vote after contacted before election day. As those people vote, I take them off the list. Mid day or so local GOP compares my checked off list with people who said they would vote and calls the once who have not showed up...
23
posted on
10/06/2006 11:31:02 AM PDT
by
dubie
To: PajamaTruthMafia
We don't call it a Civil War, we call it the War of Homosexual Agression :^)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
You know, I'm just going to hazard a guess as one of these social conservatives myself that wasn't going to vote for some Republicans that this attack on Christians and their leaders to suppress the Christian vote ain't going to go over too well.
25
posted on
10/06/2006 11:32:43 AM PDT
by
Soul Seeker
(Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
To: 100-Fold_Return
The problem with the hate filled delusional Left is that they think that our voters are as stupid as theirs. Their voters have huge numbers of idiots, hate filled and delusional people who have a very low political IQ so they are easily deceived and controlled. Our voters are vastly smarter and they do not buy the lies and the emotions of the Left else we would not have been able to win any election. Our voters know very well that it is the Republican party that is making pro-life laws and stopping the gay agenda where as it is the democrat party that is making law to kill babies on demand and to advance the gay agenda. No list is going to change what our voters think of the difference between the two parties and hence it will have zero effect on the way our base vote.
26
posted on
10/06/2006 11:34:21 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: DryFly
A couple of rather well-known conservative radio and web figures on the list too. Assuming it's accurate. Who knows if this wasn't made at a Kinkos in Abilene.
I find the rule seems to be that any single man who doesn't have a deep voice, or has manicured findernails makes these lists.
27
posted on
10/06/2006 11:34:41 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Where's the list of the adulterers? the tax cheats? the racist? And those with a violent nature?? Who has subscriptions to Playboy? High Times? Chicks With D****?? Who's pulled a Martha Stewart? or had a Lewinski at work??
And while we're at it... let's have 'em all pee in a cup for a lookie loo.
28
posted on
10/06/2006 11:35:03 AM PDT
by
sweet_diane
("They hate us 'cause they ain't us.")
To: edcoil
"I have a copy. I'm not going to publish it. For one, I don't know for a fact that the men on the list are gay." Look, no one can guarantee any information 100%. Just put the list out - we're all grown ups here. We can deal with the hard truth that only liberals have access to... Out the list as some might say.
I resent the crap out of groups that think we must be kept in the dark and fed sh-T. The proverbial mushrooms... If we have gays, are they with us because they're conservative or because they couldn't win as liberals in conservative districts?
Foley was a democrat until he couldn't win in a conservative district. His "politics" were little more than a lust for power. Are there others like him? Others who want to play us for fools? We have the right to know... Are there more gays in Congressional jobs than there are evangelicals? Are evangelicals the group that's really discriminated against? Why can't straight kids be pages? What's with the gay page thing? What's wrong with being hetro? Whatever the truth is, it needs to be put on the table.
29
posted on
10/06/2006 11:35:30 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Quickest way to put the Foley scandal behind us is for Foley to switch parties - BufordP)
To: jrooney
"I would walk through a mine field covered in broken glass bare foot with a blind fold on to vote. Any social conservative that stays home this election because we have gays in our party is a fool. "
dittos
30
posted on
10/06/2006 11:36:13 AM PDT
by
sweet_diane
("They hate us 'cause they ain't us.")
To: PajamaTruthMafia
"The inherent inconsistency of a coalition that shelters both gay loathing 'Christian' conservatives and conservative gays will soon suffer its final rupture."
An open letter to David Corn:
Mr. Corn:
Once again you have shown you and other liberals just don't get the thinking and nuance behind conservative, much less Christian, thinking in this absurd and see-through attempt to suppress Republican turnout by announcing people in positions of power who are gay, as if the fact there are gays in the GOP is news to anyone.
Contrary to your simple-minded views, we do not "loathe" gays. We disapprove of the behavior as being violative of God's laws. I think few of us if any are shocked to learn that within the Republican ranks there are gays, both those actively living the lifestyle and those resisting the temptation to live God's laws instead.
None of us are going to turn on the GOP Mr. Corn merely because like the rest of society there are gays in our midst. I think most of us say the life they lead is between them and God and that it has nothing to do with why we support the GOP or how we see the GOP as being the best protector of our views on everything, not just values, from national security, to taxes to limiting the size of govt. (though the GOP has fallen down badly on the job on this later imperative) to protecting our constitution with judges who faithfully interpret the constitution, not re-write it to fit their ideology.
No Mr. Corn, your cheap and tawdry tactic will be seen by conservatives for what it is. It will not impact a single vote on election day, other than perhaps those who now vote Republican out of revulsion for the sleazy and hypocritical Democratic smears going on. And I bet just a few will be liberal gays.
There will be no civil war in the GOP. But there will be a reckoning you will need to have with your own conscience and the struggle you and your party will need to engage with your own moral sense, if there is even any moral sense left in your party, when you realize how you cheapened democracy. You will wake up the morning after the election is over and if you have even an ounce of conscience left, you'll feel scummy and dirty. And that's as it should be.
No Mr. Corn. We conservatives are not simpletons who are so besotten in bigotry and fear as you want to believe that we would turn on an entire party which promises so much more in terms of what's important to us than you Democrats could ever hope to offer because of the sins of a few of its members.
Apparently the liberal mindset tells you we view ourselves as perfect and that nothing less than perfection will due. No, that is not the case. We just ask for accountability is all, something that Democrats long ago put themselves beyond whether it was Bill Clinton, Gerry Studds, Barney Frank or Ted Kennedy (interesting the 3 latter all come from liberal Massachusetts isn't it?) We just see ourselves as people who are trying harder to do what's right, and don't try to cover up, make excuses or smear accusers when we've been found to have done wrong. That's your party's tactic Mr. Corn and we want nothing of it. But that doesn't mean we do not recognize our own shortcomings or that there are people who struggle with the same temptations common to man.
So we have gays in the GOP. This isn't news to anyone and it's even less impactful in terms of importance to any of us. The fact is, they do not run the party or its agenda nor force the party to alter marriage to allow same sex unions. Our party does not fight for special rights for gays in other ways, allowing them for example to advertise their sexuality in schools or in other jobs and then to be protected by the law from losing those jobs because they sought to impose their sexuality inappropriately.
So why would any of us lay back and not vote on election day because there are gays in our party and allow your party which is the custodian of the gay agenda, and most every other agenda we find repulsive, to take power and to move ahead those things we think endanger the nation, whether economic, cultural or security related??
You've drastically underestimated and miscalculated who we are Mr. Corn. And in so doing you've awoken a sleeping giant ready to knock you Democrats back on your heels on election day with the voter turn-out juggernaut that's coming your way. You have shown us the sleaziest and ugliest in human nature as it lusts for raw power and the blow-back from this is going to be massive. During a time of national danger, you Democrats hypocritically tried to change the subject from terrorism, national security, the need to be successful in Iraq and our continued prosperity to the private sexual lives of people many of us have never even heard of, and this after spending the late 1990s telling us how President Clinton's sexual escapades, not mere dirty talk or preference, in the Oval Office were "private matters" and "none of our business."
Mr. Corn, we're not buying it and we have long memories about your party's hypocrisy. You clearly don't know us, the complexity of our thinking or what you have helped to unleash on Democratic candidates in the coming election. And just a little of it may come from the gay community you liberals hypocritcally claim to champion, but which now are using their preferences as a weapon in this sexual McCarthyism you are playing with.
I suggest on November 8th you will wake up not only feeling cheap and low, but feeling you made a grave miscalculation and helped to unleash the whirlwind on your party's candidates. Good luck sleeping between now and then, and after. You will be spending years Ophellia-like trying to wash out this "Damned spot" Mr. Corn.
31
posted on
10/06/2006 11:36:40 AM PDT
by
MikeA
(Foley has resigned. Bin Laden has not. That is what 's at stake in this election, not some pervert.)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
The senders... seem to be hoping to set off a civil war within the GOP... These guys really don't get it. It isn't going to happen.
If you agree with me on the issues, I'm not going to pry into your private life. If you agree with me on 80% of the issues, I'm going to argue with you about the 20% and still not pry into your private life.
Corn's point seems to be that there is something wrong with a pervert voting Republican. He can't imagine that, first, there are other issues, and second, that someone might not favor making his private perversion public policy.
For a guy like Corn, evidently, if you are a pervert you must by definition be a Democrat; if you are not, you are a traitor to your own kind.
There are times when you have to let Democrats make your case for you.
Still, if someone gets "outed" by the Democrats I see no reason to go into a frenzy. If you agree with me on the war, on the Constitution, on budget matters, that doesn't give you a pass on your moral character but I'm not going to kick you out of the party either. Just don't go "Foley" on me, and we'll be fine.
32
posted on
10/06/2006 11:38:52 AM PDT
by
marron
To: ElkGroveDan
The list is there on one of the blogs. Just follow the links. It's on a left-side sidebar. I'm not going to publish it here, but I read it.
No need to publish it, just link it. Why the big secret? "Pssst, the beer is in the cooler hidden in the room, 3rd door on the left-BUT I"M NOT GOING TO GIVE YOU BEER"
lol
33
posted on
10/06/2006 11:41:46 AM PDT
by
icwhatudo
(The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
To: MikeA
34
posted on
10/06/2006 11:47:41 AM PDT
by
cwb
(Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
To: cwb
Thanks. I know Corn is pretending he has nothing to do with this, but apparently he is a facilitator of it. He's just trying to protect himself from possible lawsuit by claiming some lone ranger is doing this.
35
posted on
10/06/2006 11:49:29 AM PDT
by
MikeA
(Foley has resigned. Bin Laden has not. That is what 's at stake in this election, not some pervert.)
To: icwhatudo; ElkGroveDan
The list is there on one of the blogs. Just follow the links. It's on a left-side sidebar. I'm not going to publish it here, but I read it.No need to publish it, just link it. Why the big secret? "Pssst, the beer is in the cooler hidden in the room, 3rd door on the left-BUT I"M NOT GOING TO GIVE YOU BEER" lol
Yeah, put up or shut up.
To: PajamaTruthMafia
I think that all Republican members of Congress should step out and announce that they are gay is solidarity with the gay men that the Democratic party are victomizing.
"I Senator Foghorne would like to standup for the persicuted minority and say that I stand with my brothers of all race creeds and sexual orientation. If the Democratic party wants to persicute gay man, then persicute me."
37
posted on
10/06/2006 11:51:06 AM PDT
by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: MikeA
Excellent post, MikeA. You hit the 10 ring with that one!
38
posted on
10/06/2006 11:54:51 AM PDT
by
piytar
To: piytar
39
posted on
10/06/2006 11:56:19 AM PDT
by
MikeA
(Foley has resigned. Bin Laden has not. That is what 's at stake in this election, not some pervert.)
To: MikeA
Corn seems to think the Republican Party and normal Religious people think like the folks from the Westboro Baptist Church!
Religious folks are deeply concerned about the "Gay" agenda but Conservative gay people are on the whole not working to advance the most offensive bits of this agenda.
Religious people who are rational reach out to folks who struggle and try to help if they are trying to live a "good" life.
40
posted on
10/06/2006 11:59:13 AM PDT
by
dalight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson