To: RegulatorCountry; nopardons; Enchante; tgslTakoma
Here's when the story broke:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1710267/posts
Mr. Edmunds posted about it on the Pages website at 2:12pm which means if he was in Oklahoma he posted 6 minutes after ABC's article was posted on the internet. Now what are the chances that was just a coincidence???
264 posted on
10/06/2006 9:11:30 PM PDT by
AmeriBrit
(By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
To: AmeriBrit
which means if he was in Oklahoma he posted 6 minutes after ABC's article was posted on the internet.WOW! Tha's almost as quick as MD4Bush (another 'RAT dirty trick last year in MD) posted his stuff on FR after that "scandal" hit the newspaper.
It looks like he was just waiting for the story to hit ABC's webpage.
To: AmeriBrit
Wow. I forgot about his OK locale (Jordan Edmund). I felt it was a timezone thing.
268 posted on
10/06/2006 9:27:38 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
(Depose Nancy! What did she know and when did she know it?)
To: AmeriBrit; RegulatorCountry; nopardons; tgslTakoma; piasa
HOLD ON!! Is ABC's account of the initial milder emails to the kid in LA in conflict with what they've said in the past 24 hours about when/how they learned of the more graphic IMs?
I'm going to have to review all the details on many threads because I think I just saw a huge inconsistency in ABC's claims about what they knew and when..... (but there are so many balls in the air I might be the one mixed up). I thought that ABC's VP of something just said that they never saw the really nasty IMs until after they published their article on the emails to the 16-17 yr. old page in Louisiana..... yet THIS article (which seems tob e the first one??) has the quote "sick sick sick sick...." (though there are not nearly as many sicks as appeared in later articles!!).
IIRC, the "sick sick sick 12-13 sicks" came from a comment on the IMs (which were indeed very graphic), and NOT to the original emails to a DIFFERENT page which were pretty mild (how can you say "sick sick sick....." to the initial emails unless you already know there's a lot more graphic stuff behind them? If this thread has the original ABC article about the more innocuous ("overly friendly") but non-explicit emails, didn't ABC just claim today that they never saw the nasty IMs until more pages got in touch with them about the first email article???
The young man forwarded that e-mail to a congressional staffer saying it was "sick sick sick sick sick."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1710241/posts
274 posted on
10/06/2006 10:00:42 PM PDT by
Enchante
(There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson