Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: engrpat

The headline is misleading. The money will still be spent on a fence, but there is flexibility in what that fence will look like. It won't be the same design in all places. In some places, it will be electronic. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me.


5 posted on 10/06/2006 6:56:38 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
It isn't going to happen. Neither party will allow us to seal the borders.

Their efforts are to placate and delude their constituents.

(How do you know a politician is lying?)

7 posted on 10/06/2006 7:00:35 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

Virtual fence is a real nothing.

A border patrol agent 200 miles away is still powerless.

Agents can be paid off (as seen in the past)

A physical barrier will work. The fence is SUPPOSED to be a high tech barrier or smart fence!


9 posted on 10/06/2006 7:02:51 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gubamyster

.


63 posted on 10/07/2006 9:26:05 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
Ill withhold judgment for now but this article suggests the money will be spent on a so called "virtual" fence. Otherwise known as "not a fence". If true its a case of deception plain and simple.
70 posted on 10/09/2006 3:46:38 PM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson