Posted on 10/06/2006 6:49:47 AM PDT by engrpat
WASHINGTON - No sooner did Congress authorize construction of a 700-mile fence on the U.S.-Mexico border last week than lawmakers rushed to approve separate legislation that ensures it will never be built, at least not as advertised, according to Republican lawmakers and immigration experts.
GOP leaders have singled out the fence as one of the primary accomplishments of the recently completed session. Many lawmakers plan to highlight their $1.2 billion down payment on its construction as they campaign in the weeks before the midterm elections.
But shortly before recessing late Friday, the House and Senate gave the Bush administration leeway to distribute the money to a combination of projects -- not just the physical barrier along the southern border. The funds may also be spent on roads, technology and "tactical infrastructure" to support the Homeland Security Department's preferred option of a "virtual fence."
What's more, in a late-night concession to win over wavering Republicans, GOP congressional leaders pledged in writing that American Indian tribes, members of Congress, governors and local leaders would get a say in "the exact placement" of any structure, and that Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff would have the flexibility to use alternatives "when fencing is ineffective or impractical."
The loopholes leave the Bush administration with authority to decide where, when and how long a fence will be built, except for small stretches east of San Diego and in western Arizona. Homeland Security officials have proposed a fence half as long, lawmakers said.
This case reflects political calculations by GOP strategists that voters do not mind the details, and that key players -- including the administration, local leaders and the Mexican government -- oppose a fence-only approach, analysts said.
(Excerpt) Read more at dfw.com ...
We didn't have anywhere near as much illegal immigration with Clinton in the White House as we do with Bush. When we had a Democrat president, we at least had a Republican congress that appeared to be fighting for us.
Now the congress is just a rubber stamp for this craven, open borders, one-worlder.
In a word, no.
.
ets face it, folks
this fence/wall is not gonna be built until we have a leader who WILL DEMAND IT! "
Which I don't think is going to happen.
In a word, yes. That particular location is in a National park which means the Federal government owns all the land. I'm sure they could find a suitable location for the fence.
I went to the link. I don't believe the fence would have to be at that exact spot. Because they own all the land they could use the path of least resistance. Mexicans are risking their lives to cross inhospitable desert every day and many of them are dying. If the fence is built only on the easiest places to cross the border they will risk their lives to cross at the more difficult spots. The "toothpaste effect" has already been shown in areas, like San Diego, where fence has been built and in areas with increased spot enforcement. The point is that the entire border needs to be secured, not just the easier areas.
And that's the only point I was trying to make. We don't need a fence at Santa Elena Canyon because the natural barrier is better than any we fence we could build anywhere along the border.
I agree that we have to deter crossing at all points along our border, but we might as well do it intelligently. The border is not uniform and the fence doesn't have to be uniform in order to be effective.
BTTT...
hmmm, person who wrote this works for The Washington Post. This is the same tactics that are used to divide and conquer, and right before an election too !
People have said this is not true... but have yet to produce any source that it was untrue... Washington Post is pretty credible to me, so until I see proof otherwise, I believe this story.
Great, they will build a pretty white picket fence 2-1/2 feet tall and stretching all of 50 miles. When it doesn't work they will say, "See...fences don't work, not without comprehensive reform".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.