Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foleygate May Turn Into CREWgate
Strata-Sphere ^ | October 5th, 2006 | AJStrata

Posted on 10/06/2006 12:22:34 AM PDT by John Lenin

Foleygate May Turn Into CREWgate

Posted by AJStrata on October 5th, 2006

The FBI, which keeps meticulous records and has no reason to spin this mess, is now claiming that CREW had the emails as early as April and that they were so heavily redacted the FBI could not do much with them - so says the Washington Post:

Law enforcement officials said then that the e-mails did not provide enough evidence of a possible crime to warrant a full investigation. In the e-mails, Foley praises the physical attributes of one page and asks another teenager for his picture.

In subsequent days, unidentified Justice and FBI officials told reporters that the e-mails provided by CREW were heavily redacted and that the group refused to provide unedited versions to the FBI. One law enforcement official — speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation — also told The Washington Post the FBI believed that CREW may have received the e-mails as early as April and that the group refused to tell the FBI how they were obtained.

April! If CREW was so worried about the well being of these Pages why wait until July to release them to authorities if they had them in April. And as someoneMichael Barone pointed out tonight on Fox News, Crew could have provided the emails to Democrat members of the Page and Ethics Committees of the House - but they did not! Why? Why give useless versions only to the FBI in July?

What the Post is not reporting is CREW mentioned on CNN their source was a Hill Staffer. And how long did the Hill Staffer have these emails? Why is CREW obstructing the investigation?



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: crew; foley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: John Lenin

Looks like conservatives will need to keep this story alive cause the DBM will now want to completely drop it now that the rats premeditated, sleezy October surprise has been found out.


21 posted on 10/06/2006 2:08:21 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats, terrorists, Powell, McCain, Graham & Collins are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boop
I just saw the repeat of Cavuto where Soros was a "guest".

The slippery guy gives me the creeps. He and Melanie Sloan ought to sleep together and create a third devil.

22 posted on 10/06/2006 2:16:18 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( http://www.pittsburghlive.com/photos/2006-10-02/1003rschool-d.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Here's a google cache of Jordan Edmunds old MySpace page.
23 posted on 10/06/2006 2:25:34 AM PDT by F-117A (They say there is no such thing as an ex-Marine,.Murtha disproves that!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Pandora's box was opened when they flashed the "page hotline" number on the screen during Hastert's press conference yesterday. Who wants to bet there aren't ten or fifteen cogress critters, on both sides of the aisle, sweating bullets right now.


24 posted on 10/06/2006 2:40:19 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

"COULDN'T" care less. Sheesh.


25 posted on 10/06/2006 2:46:27 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Do what you love and the ridicule will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I want big time blowback.

Notice how Drudge has dropped the screaming headlines now that more is coming out about who had this info, for how long, yada, yada.

As for Foley, good riddence.

26 posted on 10/06/2006 3:45:16 AM PDT by barker (Some days are diamonds, some days are stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Well, despite the 20/20 hindsight crowd. The emails that CREW sent to the FBI asked a page for his photograph. This seemed a bit less than what might trigger a SWAT raid.

The CREW complaints to the FBI and others were calculated to be obvious as a problem EX-POST FACTO. But, these emails if triggering an investigation at the time.. would have surely gathered Gay bashing complaints.

Given the parents begged the Republican leadership to drop the issue, its hard to beat these folks up and be fair.

27 posted on 10/06/2006 3:48:58 AM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: barker

This case is over. It is dead Jim. You will never hear anything more about it from the Democrats.

Pelosi will stop the investigation in its tracks and Hastert will keep his mouth shut.

In the end, Conservatives will still come out and vote, a more Conservative Repub will take Foley's seat and every congresscritter will leave the pages alone for another couple of years.

And the idiot koolaid drinkers will still be just that, idiots.


28 posted on 10/06/2006 3:50:33 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Freedom by its nature cannot be imposed, it must be chosen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
...that the e-mails provided by CREW were heavily redacted and that the group refused to provide unedited versions to the FBI.

Then why the heck didn't the Feebs subpoena the darn things?

What was in those redactions...?

29 posted on 10/06/2006 3:57:21 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I was watching Paula Zahn on CNN last night( Thursday, 8.30 PM,EST). I was waiting for a interview with Neil Bortz. Anyways, her whole show was about Foley. She had a report on the head of CREW, a female. This lawyer lady said, "The FBI is a liar." Right on the show. Point Blank. She said that they forwarded the emails the day they got them, complete with the kids email address, and did not remove, add or redact anything. They were worried about the kid. They gave CNN the name of the female FBE sex/kid pervert agent. CNN called the agent and she wouldn't return their call.
Just from what I heard and saw of the CREW lawyer lady, I have to believe her. She was very forthright and made strong, clear declarative statements.
30 posted on 10/06/2006 4:08:38 AM PDT by Leisler (Read the Koran, real Islam is not peaceful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Wow.

Well, somebody's lying. Maybe more than one somebody. If it's the Feebs, holy smoke....

31 posted on 10/06/2006 4:10:27 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

What is "Crew"?


32 posted on 10/06/2006 4:16:57 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
www.citizensforethics.org
33 posted on 10/06/2006 4:17:51 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"Pages In The News"

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:l5DTv7DF70cJ:www.congressionalpage.org/+adlaidemocrat&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3
 

Forum Topics Replies Last Post Info
New Posts General Discussion
Talk about anything
Forum Led by: Melanne, adlaidemocrat
150 1,407 Last Post Today, 02:12 PM
In: More on Pages in the news
By: jordanedmund

I think it is dated Sept 29

Trying to find cached pages of that discussion.

34 posted on 10/06/2006 4:19:44 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

That's an explanation?


35 posted on 10/06/2006 4:22:33 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

I mean, that's "crew" but so what?


36 posted on 10/06/2006 4:23:38 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

"Justice and FBI officials told reporters that the e-mails provided by CREW were heavily redacted and that the group refused to provide unedited versions to the FBI. One law enforcement official -- speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation -- also told The Washington Post the FBI believed that CREW may have received the e-mails as early as April and that the group refused to tell the FBI how they were obtained."


37 posted on 10/06/2006 4:25:19 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Well, somebody's lying. Maybe more than one somebody. If it's the Feebs, holy smoke....

Since it's an active investigation, the FBI cannot comment. Ergo, the C.R.E.W. crew can say whatever they want without fear of contradiction...

38 posted on 10/06/2006 4:25:41 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bvw

A left-leaning ethics organization.


39 posted on 10/06/2006 4:26:08 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: boop

"Why is this "innocent waif", Mr. Soros being persecuted so?"

Because he's an weasel - and it's FUN!


40 posted on 10/06/2006 4:26:19 AM PDT by incredulous joe ("We got heaps and heaps of what we sow." -- Jack Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson