BE HERE, OR BE NOWHERE!
Posted on 10/05/2006 2:45:00 PM PDT by Tarkus2040
"If the Democraps gain control of Congress it will be because of Savage."
BS. He doesn't have that kind of "Rush influence", B. You're giving him too much credit, IMO.
"Perot got Clinton elected, and Savage is the latest Perot. You and Savage don't seem to be aware of this."
I'm very aware of that fact, B. I can't speak for Savage. I think he might have said that before, though; just can't place it, precisely.
Thanks for "informing" me, and all of us dolts.
(((Hey, your NOLA yellow bus is leaving!)))
I'm trying to get thru to him on 1-800-449-8255, c. I will give you proper atttribution, if I ever do...
Light a candle.
Spread the word... I'm on Savage, NOW!
Unlike you, I lived through the 1992 and 1996 Elections. All we Reoublicans heard from "dolts" like you was that Perot was the true Conservative. He would return Conservative values back to our culture. "Dame the Republicans" was his theme. Well, we got what you want today. Bill Clinton, Homosexual acceptance, Socialism, and perverts in the White House. You can be proud of your and Savage's "campaign". You're just another ignorant, uninformed fool, that will harm the Good Ole USofA.
Holding, on-line...
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Adoring San Fancisco. No calls? I guess I must have the delay on, I am sure bsb will torque it up
HEY I VOTED FOR PEROT. SO YOU CAN.....oh TOUCHE!!!! lol
I expect you to do your duty come November. God Bless!
He just pre-empted my call with the correct facts (from condutor john). Dammit!
Sorry, cj; I tried. That would have been the 5th time I'd gotten thru to him.
This time, his action/motive was crappy. IMO. Sorry, Mike: your motive SUCKS, in thi case!
"I'll try. If the Democraps gain control of Congress it will be because of Savage. Perot got Clinton elected, and Savage is the latest Perot. You and Savage don't seem to be aware of this. Because of your ignorance you will probably stay home and not vote. Now you have been informed."
NO, if the Republicans lose the congress, it's because of their incompetence. Even Laura Ingrham, who is much more in line with the Republican mainstream, has admitted that if the GOP loses the congress it's because of their betrayal of their conservative base. Face it, unnecessary scandals, a half-hearted war on terror, minimal resistance to eminent domain, post-humous attempts at border control, support of the Clintonesque CAFTA bill, impotence in the face of our trade deficits, allowing security checks in the Panama Canal by a Chinese connected firm from Hong Kong, etc., need I go on. The GOP has merely proven the founding fathers' warnings about absolute power. Don't blame Savage for modern political betrayel of true conservative nationalism. We need more infidels and less infidelity.
See my Post #49, d. I just got pre-empted by him. Won't be on tonite, to give FR.com and cj a plug...
Savage "pulled my rug"...
Dammit.
LOL! Good try tho...I'm 2 hours tape delay so at least when he mentions Beslan...I'll know why! lol. Poor BSB. lol
Hear! Hear! Did you steal that from Savage...or will he steal it from you? rofl! Wonderful stuff, and spot on post!
Oh well, C. That's life, I guess.
He mentions it 2x; the first is me.
Here's my intro:
"Hi Mike. An hour ago, you'd brought-up the Amish murders, in Pennsylania. My screenname is *bsb* and I'm one of your many avid listeners on FR.com.
*cj* mentioned Beslan on a post, after you'd said that subhuman-murderous-muslim-islamic-arabs didn't slaughter children.
Well, they did at the Beslan School, on 9-1-04, in Russia.
According to official data: 344 civilians were killed, 186 of them children, and hundreds more wounded.
Paradise, PA's death toll, is miniscule, in comparison. But no less saddening, gut-wrenching and heart-crushing. I weep and pray all 10 of them.
Yet, being just 23 miles west of that Amish school, slams home the point ...
Too tired to finish, C. You get the drift...
Signing-off... see you all tomorrow.
Oh, I lived thru '92 & '96, too. Voted for GHWB and Dole, though I held my nose for both. Never even comtemplated Perot, pal.
They got what they wanted: Klintoonism.
Repeat: I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THAT DIRTBAG TWERP.
I wasn't listening to Savage back then ('92). Did *he* vote for Perot, and screw-up the world, according to you?
Although I was online in '82 (CompuServe BBS, 9600 baud; IBM PS2/50), I don't remember Perot in '92. Obviously you read the DB-MSM papers. Right?
"Hear! Hear! Did you steal that from Savage...or will he steal it from you? rofl! Wonderful stuff, and spot on post!"
Just thought of it, although I'm sure someone thought of it before me.
You are grossly misinformed.
Savage would love nothing more than to see Conservatism be the dominant force in the Republican party, but leaky borders, leaky federal budgets and leaky Homosexual Foleys just keep getting in the way of that goal, I guess....
Differences between Savage and Perot:
(1) Savage is a conservative.
(2) Savage defends Bush when Bush acts like a conservative.
(3) Nobody is voting for Savage. He's not on a ballot.
No, it will be because many of you out there let the GOP get away with open borders, out of control spending, no real punishment for Clintonista's like Sandy Burglar, no real tax cuts...
And your solution (and Savage's)is to put the Democraps in control and THEN!!!you will get all the problems solved. Wake up you child!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.