To: tennmountainman
I wouldn't count on it..
Seems the page in question was no longer a page and was 18 when the IM's started getting graphic.
8 posted on
10/04/2006 9:31:53 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: TASMANIANRED
Novak needs to retire. Foley was a very good congressman, imho. Hate to see him disgraced, amd maybe others here feel the same.
11 posted on
10/04/2006 9:36:51 PM PDT by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: TASMANIANRED
Seems the page in question was no longer a page and was 18 when the IM's started getting graphic. Perhaps not graphic, but extremely inappropriate. Go back and read the transcript of the conversation where the boy says he won't turn 18 until February. Foley says he's horny, and when the boy says he should slow down because he's not yet 18, Foley tells him he can dream. Sick.
18 posted on
10/04/2006 9:41:29 PM PDT by
Kleon
To: TASMANIANRED
I have been unable to access FR for a few days and have not followed this "scandal" because I was unable to access anything but the network news, which I refused to do.
What exactly has been determined to be fact? Was Foley's contact with the underage boy sexual in any way? Where the other contacts that I heard were sexual in nature, with an underage youth?
In short, precisely WHAT is proved to have been done that was inappropriate? Has the young man involved come forward?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson