Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bnelson44

I was as confused as you, but then I went back and plowed through the whole thread.

People (internet sleuths) have cleverly found out the ID of Foley's boyfriend. From there they researched, learned his DOB, looked at the dates on the IM's from ABC, and learned he was 18, not younger as originally reported.

So it was a "Sex Chat" between consenting adults.

Still sleazy and filthy, but apparently totally legal.


211 posted on 10/04/2006 5:46:49 PM PDT by Palladin (Log Cabin Republicans have wooden heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: Palladin
But I am still confused. Give me dates. I don't see where he was over 18 when some of the IMs were sent. If the IMs occurred when he was under 18, then Foley is guilty.
278 posted on 10/04/2006 5:59:00 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson