[bnelson44]

But I am still confused. Give me dates. I don't see where he was over 18 when some of the IMs were sent. If the IMs occurred when he was under 18, then Foley is guilty.

[Palladin]

See my post at #281.

[capt. norm]

But I am still confused.

You think we don't already know that from all your other replies.

Read on and learn instead of interrupting like a perpetual question machine.

[sageb1]

Look. People here are also concerned with dates, etc. We're looking. We're researching OFF FR. Instead of just using us, try researching yourself and if you come up with something, let us know. Please. Remember we're the good guys.

[REDWOOD99]

http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/04/foley-setup-part-v-uncovering-the-conspiracy/

Please read.

[Eagles Talon IV]

"If the IMs occurred when he was under 18, then Foley is guilty."

It has been explained that the IM's of a sexual nature where sent after the boy was 18. There is nothing unseemly or illegal about a Congressman, even if gay, contacting a minor who was employed with him and inquiring about his welfare, etc.