Skip to comments.
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^
| 10-04-06
| Drudge
Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney
A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200601; 20061107; 4thestate5thcolumn; abcdisney; aravosis; barbaramikulski; biasmeanslayoffs; billburton; boycottdisney; brianrosssucks; burton; byebyedems; cuespookymusic; disneynews; distortion; drivebymedia; election; enemedia; fakebutaccurate; foley; foleygate; hitandrunjournalism; homosexualactivist; homosexualagenda; johnaravosis; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawar; mikerogers; mikulski; mslm; msm; phoneylibscandal298; powerghraib; rogers; smearcampaign; targetlist; thailand; trysellingthetruth; waltsrotatingcorpse; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: KJC1
What an odd exchange.
Foley knows where the legal boundaries are, and the man made a point of mentioning his age.
How weird.
Wonder how much the young man wanted from Foley to keep this a secret.
To: All
Well, I don't know about the rest of you.... But I'm thinking ABC News needs to repent like the men of Nineveh! Or something like that...I'm kind of confused now...that lady scares me!
To: Palladin
Who is Isatook?
Man I am so far behind here.
603
posted on
10/04/2006 6:50:32 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: KJC1
The real scoop is that the page was under 18 for part of the IM exchanges.The REAL scoop is that ABC, possibly at the behest of some political action group, misrepresented the IMs it had, and, deliberately or not, misled its viewers as to what Foley was saying to this person and when.
Foley's character is not the issue any more. It is the MSM's willingness to obfuscate facts in order to influence an election (again).
To: jrooney
Let's be fair. O'Reilly then asked Brian Ross if he knew about the new information that George Sorus was behind the group that was pushing the info on the text messages.
To: Palladin
I suspect Mr. Istook has already taken care of that.
To: The_Reader_David
it would be *really* hard to make the exchange about getting together for dinner, 'and we'll see' after his 18th birthday stick as an internet solicitation of a minor charge.I agree.
607
posted on
10/04/2006 6:51:25 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: jrooney
608
posted on
10/04/2006 6:51:25 PM PDT
by
stultorum
(dont hire illegal aliens)
To: woofie; Fishtalk
I hope you aren't in high office.
Sex with your sister is a no-no.
To: KJC1
He may have been under 18, but nothing was planned till after he turned 18. Thats what's important.
To: greasepaint
611
posted on
10/04/2006 6:51:46 PM PDT
by
LowOiL
("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
To: pepperdog
Not only that, check out #436. The IM there does indeed look like Jordan is coming on to Foley, or at least ratcheting up the interest.
612
posted on
10/04/2006 6:51:58 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: PatriotCJC
"The Brian Ross Model"
613
posted on
10/04/2006 6:52:26 PM PDT
by
lunarville
(Move over Dan Rather - Love Brian)
To: Tatze
You are correct. The IM I referenced early had the teen talking about his fake ID during an exchange about going out to get a drink.
614
posted on
10/04/2006 6:52:43 PM PDT
by
TXBubba
( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
To: stillbjorn
I have very strong suspicions about the authenticity of the IMs
I know you can cut & paste IM Text as well as alter them. But this point has never been made.
615
posted on
10/04/2006 6:52:55 PM PDT
by
Nav_Mom
To: letsgonova19087
I'm sure it will all be sorted out in time...
I hope all these im's were just to the 18 year old....then all the media did was embarrass a man from a private LEGAL conversation......
616
posted on
10/04/2006 6:53:08 PM PDT
by
Fawn
(http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
To: Tatze
When he says he's not 18 until Feb. 23...
* Were the IMs from BEFORE Feb. 23, 2003 or AFTER Feb. 23, 2003?
*If the former, he would have been 18 on Feb. 23, 2003; if the latter, he'd have been 18 not until Feb. 23, 2004, in which case he's still 20 (as of today).
617
posted on
10/04/2006 6:53:11 PM PDT
by
jdm
To: wouldntbprudent
618
posted on
10/04/2006 6:53:27 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: West Coast Conservative
hahahahaahhaahah
Thanks for that laugh~!!
619
posted on
10/04/2006 6:53:30 PM PDT
by
Nav_Mom
To: NinoFan
You may be right. Maybe I just have Foley Fatigue. Keep in mind that that is only a snippet of that IM, and the page did in fact say he didn't want to do anything "illegal." What would that be? I just don't want to see us put all of our eggs in this basket.
There is still the looming question of how these IMs got out, who knew and who hung on to them to spring them now.
620
posted on
10/04/2006 6:53:32 PM PDT
by
KJC1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson