Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^ | 10-04-06 | Drudge

Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney

A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...

ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...

ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD

(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200601; 20061107; 4thestate5thcolumn; abcdisney; aravosis; barbaramikulski; biasmeanslayoffs; billburton; boycottdisney; brianrosssucks; burton; byebyedems; cuespookymusic; disneynews; distortion; drivebymedia; election; enemedia; fakebutaccurate; foley; foleygate; hitandrunjournalism; homosexualactivist; homosexualagenda; johnaravosis; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawar; mikerogers; mikulski; mslm; msm; phoneylibscandal298; powerghraib; rogers; smearcampaign; targetlist; thailand; trysellingthetruth; waltsrotatingcorpse; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: KJC1

What an odd exchange.
Foley knows where the legal boundaries are, and the man made a point of mentioning his age.
How weird.
Wonder how much the young man wanted from Foley to keep this a secret.


601 posted on 10/04/2006 6:50:17 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: All

Well, I don't know about the rest of you.... But I'm thinking ABC News needs to repent like the men of Nineveh! Or something like that...I'm kind of confused now...that lady scares me!


602 posted on 10/04/2006 6:50:31 PM PDT by txroadkill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Who is Isatook?

Man I am so far behind here.

603 posted on 10/04/2006 6:50:32 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
The real scoop is that the page was under 18 for part of the IM exchanges.

The REAL scoop is that ABC, possibly at the behest of some political action group, misrepresented the IMs it had, and, deliberately or not, misled its viewers as to what Foley was saying to this person and when.

Foley's character is not the issue any more. It is the MSM's willingness to obfuscate facts in order to influence an election (again).

604 posted on 10/04/2006 6:50:32 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Let's be fair. O'Reilly then asked Brian Ross if he knew about the new information that George Sorus was behind the group that was pushing the info on the text messages.


605 posted on 10/04/2006 6:50:50 PM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

I suspect Mr. Istook has already taken care of that.


606 posted on 10/04/2006 6:51:09 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
it would be *really* hard to make the exchange about getting together for dinner, 'and we'll see' after his 18th birthday stick as an internet solicitation of a minor charge.

I agree.

607 posted on 10/04/2006 6:51:25 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

OMG!

Another one.


608 posted on 10/04/2006 6:51:25 PM PDT by stultorum (dont hire illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie; Fishtalk

I hope you aren't in high office.
Sex with your sister is a no-no.


609 posted on 10/04/2006 6:51:32 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

He may have been under 18, but nothing was planned till after he turned 18. Thats what's important.


610 posted on 10/04/2006 6:51:34 PM PDT by Northeastern_Realist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: greasepaint

yes


611 posted on 10/04/2006 6:51:46 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog

Not only that, check out #436. The IM there does indeed look like Jordan is coming on to Foley, or at least ratcheting up the interest.


612 posted on 10/04/2006 6:51:58 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: PatriotCJC

"The Brian Ross Model"


613 posted on 10/04/2006 6:52:26 PM PDT by lunarville (Move over Dan Rather - Love Brian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tatze

You are correct. The IM I referenced early had the teen talking about his fake ID during an exchange about going out to get a drink.


614 posted on 10/04/2006 6:52:43 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: stillbjorn
I have very strong suspicions about the authenticity of the IMs
I know you can cut & paste IM Text as well as alter them. But this point has never been made.
615 posted on 10/04/2006 6:52:55 PM PDT by Nav_Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: letsgonova19087

I'm sure it will all be sorted out in time...
I hope all these im's were just to the 18 year old....then all the media did was embarrass a man from a private LEGAL conversation......


616 posted on 10/04/2006 6:53:08 PM PDT by Fawn (http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: Tatze
When he says he's not 18 until Feb. 23...

* Were the IMs from BEFORE Feb. 23, 2003 or AFTER Feb. 23, 2003?

*If the former, he would have been 18 on Feb. 23, 2003; if the latter, he'd have been 18 not until Feb. 23, 2004, in which case he's still 20 (as of today).
617 posted on 10/04/2006 6:53:11 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

Yep.

LLS


618 posted on 10/04/2006 6:53:27 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

hahahahaahhaahah
Thanks for that laugh~!!


619 posted on 10/04/2006 6:53:30 PM PDT by Nav_Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

You may be right. Maybe I just have Foley Fatigue. Keep in mind that that is only a snippet of that IM, and the page did in fact say he didn't want to do anything "illegal." What would that be? I just don't want to see us put all of our eggs in this basket.

There is still the looming question of how these IMs got out, who knew and who hung on to them to spring them now.


620 posted on 10/04/2006 6:53:32 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,401-1,409 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson