Skip to comments.
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^
| 10-04-06
| Drudge
Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney
A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200601; 20061107; 4thestate5thcolumn; abcdisney; aravosis; barbaramikulski; biasmeanslayoffs; billburton; boycottdisney; brianrosssucks; burton; byebyedems; cuespookymusic; disneynews; distortion; drivebymedia; election; enemedia; fakebutaccurate; foley; foleygate; hitandrunjournalism; homosexualactivist; homosexualagenda; johnaravosis; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawar; mikerogers; mikulski; mslm; msm; phoneylibscandal298; powerghraib; rogers; smearcampaign; targetlist; thailand; trysellingthetruth; waltsrotatingcorpse; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: Enchante
"Now the story is about all the politicians who called typical sex talk between two ADULT homosexuals disgusting." Clinton/Lewenski = Foley/Jordan
Two consenting adults doing what they do. The dems deny them the right of privacy. It is just talk amongs adults. Where is the issue?
To: CremeSaver
amazingly, it hasn't hit there yet..
To: af_vet_1981
I'm not a fan of gays but at least Foley had the decency to resign. Clinton is scum.
183
posted on
10/04/2006 5:42:08 PM PDT
by
Reagan79
(Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
To: bnelson44
21-3.4 < 18
21-3.4 NOT = 16
184
posted on
10/04/2006 5:42:09 PM PDT
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
Maybe he did but drudge is saying they looked at the records and confirmed he was 18.
185
posted on
10/04/2006 5:42:28 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: bnelson44
"is that too much to ask for before I start piling on blaim on this kid?"
Who is blaming the 18 yr old "kid"?
To: K4Harty
Hello,
Well, well...
Gotta run for a bit, be back soon.
MOgirl
187
posted on
10/04/2006 5:42:52 PM PDT
by
MOgirl
(Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
To: jrooney
See, this is why Foley wanted to know all about the boy's birthday. He was just waiting until the boy became a man.
188
posted on
10/04/2006 5:43:22 PM PDT
by
carola
To: carola
Only one page, and an inference that they were "being contacted by former pages". This is the worst kind of bias and lies.
LLS
189
posted on
10/04/2006 5:43:29 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: LasVegasMac
2 questions.
1. Is this the same Jerry Doyle who was on B5 as Michael Garibaldi?
2. If above is true, since when does he have a radio show
To: bnelson44
How about ABC's direct admission--will that do ya?
A network source explains exchanges with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday.
191
posted on
10/04/2006 5:43:44 PM PDT
by
TheConservator
(Confutatis maledictis flammis acribus addictis. . . .)
To: Enchante
Thanks, I appreciate that. But I don't trust this blogger because if he were honorable, he wouldn't be so blatantly exposing a victim without concrete evidence and without at least trying to find out the other side of the story. I think the blogger is glorifying in the limelight and in the fact that he thinks he has put 2 + 2 together...and wants to be the 1st one out there with the blog that does so.
Still, I don't see the proof.
192
posted on
10/04/2006 5:43:49 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: stillbjorn
More than the IM's being fake I wonder about the real identity of the person with whom Foley thought he was corresponding. Not that him being caught in a sting, whether by the law or a political enemy, reduces by one whit what he is accused of. If he thought he was doing something wrong then he was doing wrong, regardless of who was on the other end of the messaging. Whatever or whoever is behind the story it's just too darn convenient for the Democrats for me to believe it's just coincidence that it appears right now. There's probably something to it, and details might be interesting but lurid, Foley beat feet way to quickly in seclusion!
In any event, my thoughts and prayers are with Rep. Foley and his family in this. I have a 'thing' for root beer floats made with A&W root beer and Blue Belle Homemade Vanilla Ice Cream. Seriously, every week or so I get an overwhelming compulsion for this combination. I've had this compulsion most of my life and consequently I weigh a LOT more than I should. I am 65-years-old and food has been a problem for me most of my life. I have tried everything known to mankind control this compulsion, all to no effect. I can't imagine having a drive as strong as this for something that's illegal, like a sexual attraction to children. My family has a history of alcoholism and suicides. Those who have not fought the demon of compulsive behavior, it's a joke. To those who live with it, it's very real.
My prayers go to Foley and his family.
To: edsheppa
Both conservatives and Republicans have repudiated Foley.
To: TheConservator
A network source explains exchanges with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place [h2]before[/h2] and after the 18th birthday.
This you call proof?
195
posted on
10/04/2006 5:44:34 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: Tatze
tatze,
I haven't seen a single post where his actions were being defended on FR? I think the tree is being lost in the forest because of the "scandal laundering" to steal a term from another freeper.
To: bnelson44
Yes, I believe they have. They just substracted back from his present age to 2003, when the IM's were exchanged.
197
posted on
10/04/2006 5:44:59 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: AZRepublican
Hey! Was this guy no longer an "intern" at the time of the sexual inuendos??? So, like, he didn't even work "under" Foley at the time of the incidents? So, like, Foley could truthfully say that he did not have sex with that Man, former intern yada-yada?!?!
Ok, I was just checking.
To: LWalk18
I think the Drudge story, based on the blogger, is that the IM sex during a house vote took place after he was 18. So no crime there. 2 consenting adults. ABC claimed it he was under 18.
But the IM relationship started before the page's 18th birthday.
199
posted on
10/04/2006 5:45:25 PM PDT
by
Tatze
(This tagline is brought to you by the Admin Moderator!)
To: Enchante
"Now the story is about all the politicians who called typical sex talk between two ADULT homosexuals disgusting." Clinton/Lewenski = Foley/Jordan
Two consenting adults doing what they do. The dems deny them the right of privacy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson