I find this disgusting. This man was a minor when the IMs took place and outing him disgusts me. I never thought I would agree with DU.
Bloggers looking for "scoops" can get carried away, like they did this time.
HE's the one who RECORDED the IMs and is using them to 'anonymously' smear the Republicans.
Oops!
The former page is now 21 - a man -
He chose to come forward now... when he is a man.
If he came forward three years ago and someone in the Dem party held this info, I feel sorry for him. But nothing stopped him from filing a complaint with federal authorities.
He did not.
I do not defend what Foley did. I'm glad he did the right thing by resigning. But when I read those IMs, somehow I just can't help thinking - - - - who stopped them from just saying NO NO NO!!!!
DU's motives are not pure. Do not be fooled by substitutions.
No, he wasn't. RTFA.
At 18 you can joinj the marines and die for your country, you are a man not a minor. Why did he choose to save these IM's what is the agenda of this 21 yr old man?
he said that he would be 18 in Feb. 2003
The IM's are time-stamped APRIL 2003!
No, he was 18 - a man not a minor. Agreeing with DU is something you should have checked out ;)
If he turned 18 in February and the inflammatory IM's that everyone is making such a fuss about were dated April, then he was no longer a minor when those IMs took place.