Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eddie willers
I find it appalling that Freepers are trashing this kid and trying to prove that he was 18 and not younger. I agree with you 100%.

Foley is a sick dirt-bag regardless. But the charges are against the "party in power" for not protecting America's kids. If it turns out that the kid was of legal age, and not even a page at the time of the engagement, then there was probably nothing anyone could have done to stop this behavior. Actually, doing so would be regarded as interfering with the private affairs of two loving men. That was Gerry Studd's defense, even though the page was underage.

103 posted on 10/04/2006 4:46:54 PM PDT by Paine's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Paine's Ghost
If it turns out that the kid was of legal age, and not even a page at the time of the engagement, then there was probably nothing anyone could have done to stop this behavior. Actually, doing so would be regarded as interfering with the private affairs of two loving men. That was Gerry Studd's defense, even though the page was underage.

Gerry Studds got a standing ovation from the Dems. His Masshole constituents reelected him to five more terms. His page interaction was (a) genuinely underage (the page was 17) and (b) physically consummated, not limited to salacious messages. He and his lovely bride, Dean T. Hara, were married in the first week of gay marriage availability in Massachusetts.

Democrat attacks on Mark Foley amount to gay bashing. Gay bashing is a mortal sin in the Church of Liberalism. They should be ashamed!

119 posted on 10/04/2006 4:55:45 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Paine's Ghost

And gay-bashing.

Good point.


120 posted on 10/04/2006 4:56:29 PM PDT by vrwcagent0498 (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter are my patron saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Paine's Ghost
Foley is a sick dirt-bag regardless. But the charges are against the "party in power" for not protecting America's kids. If it turns out that the kid was of legal age, and not even a page at the time of the engagement, then there was probably nothing anyone could have done to stop this behavior. Actually, doing so would be regarded as interfering with the private affairs of two loving men. That was Gerry Studd's defense, even though the page was underage.

Something that bothers me is how the same democrats that defended BJ Clinton and claimed that oral sex was not sex, are now screetching that typed words are not only SEX but Pedophelia. The hypocrisy is staggering.

270 posted on 10/04/2006 6:03:48 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson