Foley is a sick dirt-bag regardless. But the charges are against the "party in power" for not protecting America's kids. If it turns out that the kid was of legal age, and not even a page at the time of the engagement, then there was probably nothing anyone could have done to stop this behavior. Actually, doing so would be regarded as interfering with the private affairs of two loving men. That was Gerry Studd's defense, even though the page was underage. Something that bothers me is how the same democrats that defended BJ Clinton and claimed that oral sex was not sex, are now screetching that typed words are not only SEX but Pedophelia. The hypocrisy is staggering.