Posted on 10/04/2006 1:58:14 PM PDT by Gribbit
Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag!
Now that that is out of the way I will reveal how I (and a few others) discovered Jordan Edmund was one of the former house pages that participated in sexually explicit instant messages with Rep. Mark Foley. Also I will explain to you why I believe it necessary to reveal Jordan Edmund's identity. You may not agree with my decision, but I hope to explain my reasoning by the end of this story.
Read More HERE!
If the ex-page was legal age, it changes the story.
Not one whit.
Oh, come on. At least ONE whit?
Sick as it may be, hitting on an 18 yr old is significantly different than hitting on a 16 yr old. Did I miss something?
I still find it wrong even if the kid was 18 and I would expect that no FReepers will bother him (we ought not attack him either - we don't really know his involvement - he may have been keeping these so that something would be done about Foley etc.)
I think were the 18 thing is of interest is that the MSM has been going for blood (especially Hastert's) using the 'underage' title. If the MSM (and Ross) knew he was 18 - it is further evidence that they have intentionally misled people and exposes the Dem War machine for what it is. That's why people (besides FReepers) are interested in this.
IMO, I wish the blogger had concealed the page's name, but I'm not sure it would have been taken seriously as that is the bulk of his evidence...
The Blogger is supposed to say why he posted his identity (at least that is what he says). I guess it's in the next Post on his blog.
I am sure he and his parents wanted to keep this as quiet as possible, from all I have read the conversations were mutually provocative.
Even if the MSM/Dem machine is hammered by this and Foley was in contact with an adult (by law) - I won't miss Foley - unlike Billy and the Dems, I don't tolerate hanky panky at the office especially involving someone who has recently turned 18.
It certainly does matter. There is a difference between being called a homosexual and being called a pedophile.
No.....you think a 52 year old perverted lecher is ok if the boy is a pimple-faced 18 year old rather than a pimple-faced 17 year old?
It may be very important to Foley and the law, but it means bupkis in the court of public opinion.
I was disgusted with the age difference between Clinton and Monica....and she was female and 21.
I read the blog. Hopefully it will be updated soon. As I said, if you're out to prove someone is X years old, by cross-referencing sources, I'm not sure it is possible without mentinoning their name.
It's not proven that he's the one who gave the logs to ABC. It's conceivable a leftie roommate or somebody who had access to his computer (directly or via the LAN) knew he had the logs and snarfed copies for use whenever (i.e., now).
And the pajamahadeen take another hill! Chaaaaaarge!!
You must be 19.
Get over the age of 50 and look back....then tell me that (other than legally) there is a significant difference between 16 and 18.
If you read the IMs on the web site, you will see that Jordan knew from the beginning that Foley was gay. I think that it was a game for this kid. Why else would he have saved the messages. The kid went to Berkely, and he takes jobs with Republicans. It doesn't jive.
That's the part I don't understand.
Bingo!....we have a winner...
The accuser is a mole....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.