Skip to comments.
As Dow surges, many left behind
Chicago Tribune ^
| October 3, 2006
| William Neikirk
Posted on 10/04/2006 8:39:11 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
To: Proud_USA_Republican
You sound like an expert. How often are you quoted in the NYT?
61
posted on
10/04/2006 9:58:06 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The hallmark of a crackpot conspiracy theory is that it expands to include countervailing evidence.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Let's see, according to MSM falling gas prices MAY pose a future financial problem (huh?); Dow and stock surge, investors, both individual and groups earn $$$: Many left behind (one would assume the many consist of those on welfare; the jobless; the illegal aliens, huh?).
Elderly with savings in stock and bond markets earn $$$; employed Americans with pension and stock plans earn $$$, would MSM report exactly who the "left behind" are.
62
posted on
10/04/2006 10:00:05 AM PDT
by
zerosix
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
How do you retrain a 55-year-old United Auto Worker?I will resist the strong temptation to post some highly sarcastic suggestions...
63
posted on
10/04/2006 10:03:13 AM PDT
by
Sicon
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Liberals have clearly become today's "old-timers".
For them, "The Good Ol' Days" were only six years ago...
64
posted on
10/04/2006 10:03:48 AM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: zerosix
"Fellow members of the Roman Senate, shall we continue to build palace after palace for the Rich? Or should we aspire to a nobler purpose and build decent housing for the poor? What does the Roman Senate say?"
65
posted on
10/04/2006 10:04:06 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(massgopguy (I owe everything to George Baily))
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Ignoring the media doom-and-glooming, I wonder if the Dow would be climbing if they truly believed the Democrats were about to take over the House and the Senate?
In a TradeSports kind of way, I see the rising Dow as an indication that the business community believes the Republicans are going to hold their control.
66
posted on
10/04/2006 10:06:51 AM PDT
by
Tall_Texan
("Journalislam" - reporting about murderous extremists as if they are moral equivalents.)
To: litehaus
Which year and what was the percentage?
67
posted on
10/04/2006 10:25:50 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: frogjerk
68
posted on
10/04/2006 10:29:47 AM PDT
by
litehaus
(A memory tooooo long)
To: Sicon
Isn't that the stupidest comment you've ever heard? She's saying, in effect, that the "55-year-old United Auto Worker" is too f-ing stupid and lazy to learn anything new.
69
posted on
10/04/2006 10:33:59 AM PDT
by
lesser_satan
(EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
To: lesser_satan
Well, I wasn't actually suggesting that the remark was stupid. My sarcasm would have been directed at the UAW members. But to be fair, not ALL of the UAW members are stupid, lazy, overcompensated, etc. - just most of them.
70
posted on
10/04/2006 10:41:09 AM PDT
by
Sicon
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Ah, the good ole days of dot-bomb stocks and smoke and mirror, shell-game budget surpluses.
Just for giggles, I kept checking the National Debt Clock and it never slowed down one bit during all those fantastic budget surpluses.
71
posted on
10/04/2006 10:41:46 AM PDT
by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
To: litehaus
72
posted on
10/04/2006 11:29:03 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: N. Theknow
Interesting how the debt kept going UP during those so-called surplus years, huh?
73
posted on
10/04/2006 12:40:21 PM PDT
by
litehaus
(A memory tooooo long)
To: denydenydeny
Ah, yes, the Clinton years, when there were no homeless and no poor. They all magically reappeared on January 20, 2001.I knew a woman who ran a homeless shelter in the 1980s and 1990s. She tried to do more than just provide a bed and a meal; she worked with those who wanted to leave the lifestyle, tried to get them help. Some of her former charges are now sober, working, and generally a credit to society.
She said she could get grants from liberal-minded foundations, no problem--right up to Election Day, 1992.
Then the money just stopped dead.
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA; MarkeyD; Darnright; All
People tend to associate the Clinton years with the stock market boom. Most forget (and the MSM doesn't do anything to remind them) that the bubble burst during Clinton's reign. This point needs to be repeated until it's driven homeIt seems that A LOT of people have SHORT memories on the REAL reasons for this! The reason the stock market took a dive was because the Republicans talked down the economy!!
COME ON NOW... THINK!! Don't you remember this! The DUmbocrats said was so! DAMN Republicans!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson