Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Scandals To Come? (Possible Other Members of Congress!)
Political Wire ^ | 10/3/06

Posted on 10/03/2006 11:52:36 AM PDT by areafiftyone

More Scandals to Come?

Last night, ABC News investigative journalist Brian Ross suggested "there may be other members of Congress who engaged in inappropriate behavior towards congressional pages."

Said Ross, "We’re hearing quite a bit from former pages. They’re sending us all sorts of messages about possible other members."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 last
To: Welike ike; nopardons

You were asked for your source. I asked you and you didn't reply. We provide sources here.

You're one rude poster. Learn some manners.


181 posted on 10/03/2006 5:46:07 PM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
Blarney Flag.......

Did his boy have a business permit for that "home" business?

182 posted on 10/03/2006 5:49:21 PM PDT by pointsal (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Welike ike

Even if that is true, so what? Why wouldn't the Dems make sure the media got the goods? And what is wrong with that? Am I missing something here?


183 posted on 10/03/2006 7:02:28 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Torie ? I am suprised you do not get it.

If Klein's camapign manager sat on these emails for months while also working for Pelosi it means Nancy knew it too.

It means the Democrats also allowed other pages to be exposed,before timing their leak to Brain Ross.


184 posted on 10/03/2006 7:33:39 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Welike ike

Maybe, if true, if you are saying that the Dems were sitting on the Instant Messages, as opposed to the more ambiguous I want your picture request Foley email (a claim as to the IM's if that is what you mean, that you have yet to back up). But that is what the opposition does. The opposition sits on dirt for release at the most opportune time. It is the duty of those not in opposition, to embrace transparency. It is also smart. When they do, they will be rewarded.


185 posted on 10/03/2006 7:41:30 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Torie

It means the Democrats are just as guilty as the GOP of not exposing Foley sooner. It makes Pelosi looks look like she did not care about the safety of the pages, but timed the leak for political gain.


186 posted on 10/03/2006 7:43:05 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Torie did that help the GOP in the Lewinsky scandal in the 1998 elections? No. They overplayed like the Democrats are doing now


187 posted on 10/03/2006 7:45:02 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Welike ike

Just document that Pelosi knew what Hastert did, when Hastert knew it, and you will make news.


188 posted on 10/03/2006 7:45:06 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Welike ike

I think the Dems might by overplaying their hand, but that has nothing to do, with the party in power, airing their own dirty laundry as soon as they know it is dirty.


189 posted on 10/03/2006 7:47:04 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Torie we agree to disagree. I think that in the world of Larry Flynt this page will be exposed. The dots will be connected and the trail will get back to the DEMS.

We agree that the DEMS are overplaying their hand trying to suppress the GOP base. But the Republicans at my district and workplace are irate at this DEM smear and are galvinized. And I am in a swing district.


190 posted on 10/03/2006 7:57:46 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Welike ike

I have no problem with varying judgments. You still need to try to back up your speculations with some sources, or links, or just admit you were speculating. Just my advice.


191 posted on 10/03/2006 8:26:21 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: pointsal
Blarney Flag.....

Roger that.

192 posted on 10/04/2006 4:55:18 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson