Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to sign bill to prevent Internet gambling
AFP ^ | Oct 02 | Staff

Posted on 10/03/2006 2:52:04 AM PDT by baystaterebel

US President George W. Bush this week is expected to sign a bill making it harder to place bets on the Internet, a practice which already is illegal in the United States. Bush was expected to act quickly after Congress approved the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act making it illegal for financial institutions and credit card companies to process payments to settle Internet bets. It also created stiff penalties for online wagers.

Billions of dollars are wagered online each year and the United States is considered the biggest market.

"It is extraordinary how many American families have been touched by large losses from Internet gambling," said US Representative Jim Leach, the bill's main sponsor in the House, in a statement after its passage early Saturday.

The bill's chief Senate sponsor was conservative Republican Jon Kyl, who, like Leach, has said he believed Internet gambling was a moral threat. He has called online betting as the Internet version of crack cocaine.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: baystaterebel

The government's real interest is in collecting the taxes that the internet gamblers aren't paying. It's always the money.


21 posted on 10/03/2006 3:57:07 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

It is not about tax. It is a sop to the mid-term elections because it is a vote-winner for many on the Christian-right.

It will not last much beyond that.


22 posted on 10/03/2006 3:58:25 AM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006
I just think it's a bit backward and a blow on personal freedom, when American adults cannot live their lives like the rest of the free world because it offends other Americans who have different beliefs.

Welcome to the Republican Party. We're Democrats with Bibles.

23 posted on 10/03/2006 3:59:45 AM PDT by Wormwood (Everybody lies, but it doesn't matter because nobody listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

good point


24 posted on 10/03/2006 3:59:46 AM PDT by Taggart_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood
Welcome to the Republican Party. We're Democrats with Bibles.

That's a tagline waiting to happen!

25 posted on 10/03/2006 4:01:53 AM PDT by Bella_Bru (http://folding.stanford.edu/ - - - -Folding@home. Free Republic team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen
"I don't gamble but, why exactly is the Federal involved in this?"

The cynic in me says this is an attempt to protect our domestic gambling industry from foreign competition. But I'm sure there will now be a move to eliminate it as well because, obviously, the only agenda here is to protect the American family from the potential devastation of gambling. /s

26 posted on 10/03/2006 4:02:48 AM PDT by VRWCtaz ("Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness." - Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

Maybe I am wrong, but the Republican Party always seemed the realists to me - bible in hand or not.

You cannot un-invent the modern world. Gambling shops and casinos have been in UK high streets since the sixties, without armaggeddon.


27 posted on 10/03/2006 4:08:13 AM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

You would think they could find something more useful to do with their time than this! Personal responsibility is what should govern gambling!!


28 posted on 10/03/2006 4:09:34 AM PDT by Proveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I've had it with these Republicans. I'm usually an across the board Republican Voter, but not this time. This was pretty slimy to attach this at the last second.

And of course, our President will approve it as he never veto's anything.
29 posted on 10/03/2006 4:16:06 AM PDT by excalibur1701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

A foolish man will be seperated from his money soon...


30 posted on 10/03/2006 4:16:59 AM PDT by observer5 (It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

We have a left wing government but we are not a Socialist State you make Britain sound like the old Eastern Block.

We have a free market economy in fact as far as gambling is concerned for the ordinary person much freer with betting shops in most towns.


31 posted on 10/03/2006 4:43:31 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: observer5

Yep! And when they sit at a table with me thats exactly what happens.

Many who do not poker or know little about it think it is purely a game of chance. If you were only to be dealt one hand and bet it all on the outcome you would be correct.

But that is not how it works.

As they say, the more I practice the luckier I get.


32 posted on 10/03/2006 4:43:55 AM PDT by baystaterebel (http://omphalosgazer.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
You can still go to your local Indian reservation and gamble

Why should I have to go to a friggin' Indian reservation when I have a computer right here in my house?

33 posted on 10/03/2006 4:44:22 AM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

(""It is extraordinary how many American families have been touched by large losses from Internet gambling," said US Representative Jim Leach........." )

How about large losses families suffer of sending an 18 year old warriors to get,blinded,maimed,crippled and/or killed playing social worker for a war they have no idea how to get out of?
Instead these stupid bastards will now pay 2 FBI guys a 150K a year to spy on some slob making a 25 dollar football bet on Sunday.
What these clueless fascist frauds like Frist,Kyle Leach et al. did do is open up a new/old market of brick and mortar street books.
Here a tip for ya, Frist and frauds,get off the phone with that 14 year old and call up your book and take the Dodgers +130 against the Mets.....you'll need the money when your in the unemployment line when you and your righteous hypocrates get voted out of office.


34 posted on 10/03/2006 4:45:47 AM PDT by TShaunK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

Will Bush stop me from 'gambling' in the stock market over the internet, too?


35 posted on 10/03/2006 4:48:26 AM PDT by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel
have been touched by large losses from Internet gambling,

I know a woman who has a 5 figure credit card debt , quite a bit from clothes but mostly from shoes .

Next we need to ban woman's shoes , maybe a maximum purchase of once a month like they want to do with guns
36 posted on 10/03/2006 4:53:35 AM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

(have been touched by large losses from Internet gambling,

I know a woman who has a 5 figure credit card debt , quite a bit from clothes but mostly from shoes .)

How about large losses from credit card companies intrest they charge from going from 6% intrest to 15% interest in fine print that these politicians say they can't control from these loan shark credit card companies.Its funny the politicians don't try to protect my money then.


37 posted on 10/03/2006 5:02:01 AM PDT by TShaunK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

J,
I don't think most of the "religious right" gives a rip about this. It isn't in their top 5 anyway.
A


38 posted on 10/03/2006 5:04:44 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (outside a good dog, a book is your best friend. inside a dog it's too dark to read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Diverdogz

possibly-

one thing this dufus government found out -

How easy it is for terrorists and other goverments to

launder money. And our banks are willing accomplices to

allow anyone to do large transactions without them knowing

the trail of money-


39 posted on 10/03/2006 5:15:55 AM PDT by mj1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
Some are under the impression that playing online poker is illegal and falls under the 1961 Wire Act. This is not true.

From Wikipedia:

"The Interstate Wire Act of 1961, often called the Federal Wire Act, is a United States federal law prohibiting the operation of certain types of betting businesses in the United States. It begins with the text:

Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.[1] The law has been interpreted by some, including the Department of Justice, to mean that all online gambling is illegal. However, U.S. Courts have ruled to the contrary. Also, many believe the phrase "in the business of" means only businesses are affected. Some argue that the law only covers sports betting, and not other forms of gambling such as poker.

The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting and not other types of online gambling.[2] The Supreme Court has not ruled on the meaning of the Federal Wire Act as it pertains to online gambling."

40 posted on 10/03/2006 5:19:50 AM PDT by baystaterebel (http://omphalosgazer.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson