[conservative in nyc]

I had to cut and paste the article due to the 300 word limit. Most of the rest of the article discusses why the St. Petersburg Times and Miami Herald didn't run the story when they first heard of it last year: Not enough evidence and the page didn't want to go on record.

The rumors started resurfacing in June. Did Democrats in the House not hear of it then? The left-wing CREW group now claims it refered the e-mails to the Justice Department in July.

[conservative in nyc]

Ping.

[originalbuckeye]

Why would they talk about this last summer when they could wait until fall and have it interfere more with the election?

[Greenpees]

The Demoncrats endangered teenage boys for months in order to pop the news closer to the election. They disgust everyone. The story should be told, but it will never see the light of day.

[penelopesire]

Thanks for the ping. Go check your mail from me and make sure you read every one I sent tonight. I have contacted American Thinker and am contacting the FBI in the morning. Maybe tonight...if I can find the tip line they spoke of today.
Honestly..I have stumbled onto a potentially explosive link in this chain and am actually shaking with a bit of fear.

Folks, I hope you understand why I can not post it all yet on the board.

[George W. Bush]

So they knew of the non-story with former pages, who were over the age of consent?

The media is trying hard to drive a Foley wedge between the GOP and the social conservatives. It's obvious how much they want this.

Ain't gonna happen. It might actually get people mad enough to turn out in larger numbers to vote GOP. It's insulting to think they believe we're stupid enough to fall for their 'scandal'.

[Just mythoughts]

"Then, in June, the reports resurfaced on Capitol Hill, where a neighborhood resident struck up a conversation in a bar with someone who had provided the e-mail messages. He said he passed them on to several news outlets. The resident, who said he was not affiliated with either party and was motivated by concern for the teenager, would talk only on condition of anonymity."

Oh please they have got to come up with something better than this, at least the name of the 'bar', might give a hint about party affiliation.

[Prost1]

The DoJ needs to supeonea reports and editors right and left.

Pull Bill Keller in as a start. NIE..."what do you know and when did you know it?" Waterboard time!

Same with these cretins holding back on Foley. It was clear to me he was a $3 bill, but child predator? Maybe a member of Nambla? Buddies with Barney Frank? Who else?

Arrest, interogate, waterboard...Get the info!

[jimbo123]

ABC's Ross in under investigation by the FBI for his role in the CIA leaks case.

His phone calls to and from CIA leakers have been collected as evidence in the case.

So this is just sour grapes.

Ross is afraid of prison and is trying to say that his upcoming indictment is going to be retribution by the GOP.

[Mo1]

Then, in June, the reports resurfaced on Capitol Hill, where a neighborhood resident struck up a conversation in a bar with someone who had provided the e-mail messages. He said he passed them on to several news outlets. The resident, who said he was not affiliated with either party and was motivated by concern for the teenager, would talk only on condition of anonymity.

Just happened to hand over IM's in a bar???

And who was this person

[NutCrackerBoy]

The New York Times is cleverly getting out ahead of the alternative media, preparing the ground. When alternative media exposes smoking guns on how the story was finely orchestrated as an election year HIT, they will be falsely represented as accusing Dems of "framing" Foley.

[Nathan Zachary]

"None of the organizations seemed to anticipate how big the story would become."

Yeah right. This is sucha glaring, blatant LIE I can hardly look at it. Someone hand me a welding mask.

[Free Vulcan]

Guys, I'm letting this one play out. This thing stinks to high heaven. Foley may be guilty, but this thing has an MD4Bush smell to it I don't like.

[patj]

“I hate to give up sources, but to the extent that I know the political parties of any of the people who helped us, it would be the same party,” Mr. Ross said, referring to Republicans.

So he's saying; I don't know their party but it is the Republicans. How do you know what you say you don't know?

[Doogle]

......nothing new here folks, the MSM gets the word go and off they go, really simple. The release of any scandal has to be timed. Might as well pick up the popcorn and get comfortable, the next 6 weeks is going to get nasty and is going to look like a circus sideshow. Although it works out good for the dummies, because "wiggle finger" is off the front pages, but knowing him, he'll be back defending other lies and claiming a conspiracy like he did with Wallace.


Doogle

[kjam22]

And this is the story that will overtake the resigning story. Rove will work this just right. The dems have gotten this out about 3 weeks to soon.

[lawdude]

"Brian Ross of ABC News said he learned about the e-mail messages in August but was too busy with Hurricane Katrina..."

Katrina was a 2005 event. He seems to be lying to cover a timeline.

Stink to high heaven!