Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(December 30, 2005) Inquiry into leak of NSA spying program launched
CNN ^ | December 30, 2005

Posted on 10/02/2006 9:34:37 AM PDT by tomnbeverly

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Justice Department has opened an investigation into leaks to the media about the National Security Agency's classified domestic surveillance program.

The program authorizes the NSA to eavesdrop on Americans without first seeking permission from a court for a search warrant. It has caused a political uproar with both Democrats and Republicans questioning whether President Bush went beyond his powers under the U.S. Constitution in authorizing it.

The New York Times was the first to report the story on December 16th and then officials confirmed its existence to CNN and other organizations.

"The Justice Department has opened an investigation of the unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to the NSA," a Justice Department official told CNN. (Watch what the investigators will look for -- 2:02)

The leak investigation is expected to be handled, as is standard, by Justice Department prosecutors and FBI agents. Officials would not say when the investigation began.

The New York Times declined to comment on the leak investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: classified; leak
So where are we on this. Will this be the OCT Surprise with Jay Rockefeller getting indicted ? It will lose value if indictment happens after Nov.
1 posted on 10/02/2006 9:34:38 AM PDT by tomnbeverly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

Hang em high


2 posted on 10/02/2006 9:36:53 AM PDT by MattinNJ (The West has been fighting the war on terror for 1300 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
Seriously when was the last Republican-sponsored October surprise?
3 posted on 10/02/2006 9:36:54 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
They couldn't make it 2 paragraphs, without lying about the Program.

The program authorizes the NSA to eavesdrop on Americans without first seeking permission from a court for a search warrant

4 posted on 10/02/2006 9:37:14 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

About freaking time.


5 posted on 10/02/2006 9:37:24 AM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

"The program authorizes the NSA to eavesdrop on Americans without first seeking permission from a court"

That's right CNN.

Just tell 'half' the story.

Make sure you don't tell anyone WHY those 'americans' are being tapped.


6 posted on 10/02/2006 9:38:34 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal

This article is from DEC 05. Whats the result of the investigation... should be out NOW.


7 posted on 10/02/2006 9:38:57 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (The More Americans that take 911 personally the better served we will all be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
This is from December 2005
8 posted on 10/02/2006 9:39:27 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

I know.. My point is where is the Justice Dept on this... There has to be some rumors on the hill on who is the leaker/s. Are the Dems sweatin it???


9 posted on 10/02/2006 9:41:41 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (The More Americans that take 911 personally the better served we will all be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
This article is from December 30, 2005. So where are they on the investigation. Interesting, we have heard nothing more about it. Even though there may Al Qaeda infiltrators in the CIA and FBI.
10 posted on 10/02/2006 9:47:18 AM PDT by BMC1 (DEMOCRATS AND RINO'S ARE STUCK ON STUPID, MASTERS OF DECEPTION AND CULTURE OF TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

sorry 'bout that. feverish and a little slow today.

Darn good question.

Gonzales has been somewhat of a ....disappointment.


11 posted on 10/02/2006 9:56:18 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

sorry 'bout that. feverish and a little slow today.

Darn good question.

Gonzales has been somewhat of a ....disappointment.


12 posted on 10/02/2006 9:56:18 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

It's about time!

Flash Back to:

Pulitzers for Putz & Putz

The New York Times' reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau won the Pulitzer Prize today [two weeks ago] for their treasonous contribution to the undermining of the highly classified National Security Agency surveillance program of al Qaeda-related terrorists.

Rissen/Lichtblau clearly violated relevant provisions of the Espionage Act -- a particularly serious crime insofar as it lends assistance to the enemy in a time of war.

This leaves us asking.........

Did the New York Times break the law with its wire-tapping story?

The Attorneys for the NYT should be concerned with:

Quote:

Section 793 of the federal espionage law prohibits authorized persons possessing "information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation . . . "

....from disclosing it to persons not entitled to it.

Section 798 of the espionage law prohibits the disclosure of classified communications intelligence activities to unauthorized persons "in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States . . . "

The violation of these statutes is a felony.

Because their disclosures to the Times may fall within these statues, the "current and former government officials" referred to in the Risen/Lichtblau story sought the promise of confidentiality from the Times to protect their identity.

See:

Did the New York Times break the law with its wire-tapping story?

by Scott Johnson

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/631lksqg.asp



13 posted on 10/02/2006 12:23:06 PM PDT by Richbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richbee

Ping


14 posted on 10/03/2006 10:33:32 AM PDT by Richbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson