:-}. No, I simply pointed out the flaw in your logic. I'll try to elucidate. If we supported retaining Foley in Congress as the Dems retained Studds and Frank while condeming the dems then we have engaged in moral relativism.
When we point out the difference in reation to evidence of disgusting behavior by the leadership of both parties we are engaged in politics.
I really don't know why you are having trouble with that.
Your logic was flawed, I pointed that out in a respectful manner. Now you can accept that your logic is flawed or not.
Cheers!
This is not a Dem issue.
It is a GOP issue.
That is not flawed logic. That is fact. You are trying to make it a moral relativism issue. And in so doing, you are doing exactly the same thing that the Dems/leftists do.
By saying Foley was wrong, but so was X, Y, or Z a dozen years ago......that is moral relativism, and the PC crowd loves it. You fell into that trap. You are now using the leftist's techniques to defend your 'perceptions'.
They won. They caused you to use moral relativism to defend your 'perceptions'. And you didn't even see it coming.