Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 1 October 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 1 October 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 10/01/2006 4:26:20 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, October 1st, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf; Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, and his Democratic opponent, Rep. Sherrod Brown.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Presidential counselor Dan Bartlett; Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Bartlett; Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.; poet laureate Donald Hall.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Bartlett; U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad; Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.; former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; news; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840841-860861-880 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
To: penelopesire

I am wondering if he is still alive.


841 posted on 10/01/2006 12:18:55 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Oh yea, Democrats have been trying to get and show the American people they have *values* since the last election - -Dean has also been trying to prove they have them, and that they are all so religious, too (after he read the polls saw how many religious people vote for the Pubbies). When they believe that telling the truth, not lying, is a value and disown relationships and support of disgusting organizations such as NAMBRAL (I may not have that right - but you know which one I mean) and a few other orgs, then maybe we can starting discussing values with them. Until then, as far as I'm concerned they still need to get some values. It's not as easy as saying, yeah, I'm goin' go get me some of dem der values and all the voters will vote for me.


842 posted on 10/01/2006 12:26:33 PM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: Darth Republican

To modify an old joke

"You're a mean drunk... Darth Republican..."

LOL (but true)


843 posted on 10/01/2006 12:27:45 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: onyx
WOW --- I love this guy on Fox.
He nails Clinton & Burglar.

I assume you mean Scheuer?  Help out a poor, slow, Freeper.  I'm some five hours behind your post at this point.  Trying to put this together from scant clues can get difficult... <g>

And if you did mean him, yes, he nailed it.  But watch for him to be destroyed in the DBM this week as a "loose cannon."  They can't tolerate someone who calls their god a liar.

844 posted on 10/01/2006 12:31:54 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

"I am wondering if he is still alive."

well...if the lefty press wanted to...they could hunt him down. They are too busy running with the DNC template to smear Hastert et al..(rolling eyes) and hurt the entire GOP! You know the press have ways of finding people..they don't want to. I suppose they will focus on Foley if he puts a gun in his mouth. Then it will be: 'Why didn't the GOP stop Mark Foley from killing himself' or 'Did the GOP have Mark Foley killed?'....lol


845 posted on 10/01/2006 12:32:36 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 841 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

YES! I apologize for being vague --- I couldn't spell his name!


846 posted on 10/01/2006 12:32:55 PM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies]

To: benjaminjjones

Great pics


847 posted on 10/01/2006 12:35:05 PM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
I would also say that you could have people in lower earning bracket but because of their background and beliefs would be classed as upper working or lower middle.
848 posted on 10/01/2006 12:37:34 PM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Let's hope so.

On another subject - Check this out - I thought Byrd was way ahead (though I haven't seen any polls lately), which makes it curious to me that he felt the need to say this. Good on Raese for calling him on it!:

Someone finally called Byrd what is was:

West Virginia Senate Battle Turns Ugly as Byrd Uses Raese's Father
National Ledger ^ | 9/30/06 | Jim Kouri

Posted on 10/01/2006 12:03:15 PM PDT by wagglebee

West Virginia GOP senatorial candidate John Raese slapped back at Senator Robert Byrd’s reference to Raese’s deceased father in a West Virginia public television profile which aired Thursday night.

In a transcript of the program obtained by the Raese campaign Thursday afternoon, Byrd says, “(Raese’s) father was my friend. I think his father would have been … somewhat ashamed. His father would be supporting me today I feel if he were alive.”

Raese fired back, saying, “It is Senator Byrd who should be ashamed for smearing my father – and my family by extension – when he knows my father is deceased and cannot speak for himself. I am astounded at the disgusting arrogance of Senator Byrd in suggesting that my father would support ever him over his own son. Senator Byrd has a nasty habit of saying outrageous things and this is just another example of that arrogance,” Raese said.

Raese said the contrast between his father and Senator Byrd’s father is a lesson to remember.

“When I was a boy, my father was taking me to basketball and baseball games, and to Dairy Queen after the game,” said Raese.

"By contrast, according to Senator Byrd’s autobiography, his father was taking him to Ku Klux Klan meetings. Years later, when I was 34, I was running for the United States Senate. Senator Byrd was, at that same age, by his own account, recruiting members to the KKK,” he said.

Added Raese, “I know who my father would be ashamed of, and it wouldn’t be me.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1711712/posts


849 posted on 10/01/2006 12:37:54 PM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 840 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

This is is up close and personal, but when ever I Hear Woodward's voice I'm reminded of a hesitant eight year old boy talkng thru his nose with a mouth full of dry peanut butter.


850 posted on 10/01/2006 12:39:23 PM PDT by Maumee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Where is Foley?

Why is the MSM helping him hide?

The MSM has not helped a person hide since Kerry got rid of his girlfriend in Kenya. (she's on vaction of course)


851 posted on 10/01/2006 12:41:14 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]

To: chiller
Jeanine F. Pirro when she was thinking of running for the Senate instead of State Attorney General
852 posted on 10/01/2006 12:41:29 PM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

Thanks! Good comeback too. Wouldn't the Democrats have a fit if Byrd lost? ROFLOL


853 posted on 10/01/2006 12:41:29 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 849 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

LOL...Kerry's girlfriend hasn't been seen or written about since.


854 posted on 10/01/2006 12:44:13 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I suspect that this revelation was a bit premature as far as political gain for the dems.

I believe you are correct, and no one but moonbats will believe the Dems have more credibility on this issue than Repubs.

I agree with your sentiment on Foley, I just don't think he will though. As long as he didn't send the kid some child pornography, he probably will skate on this. However, now he is outed!

Sorry for the delay in the post...I just changed the spark plug wires on a Merc Cougar in between sanding walls and visiting with company!

855 posted on 10/01/2006 12:45:18 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And that is the chasm that separates the two parties in a nutshell. The left simply does not see this as a war for survival of the West, and IMO often sees this as a conflict that is punishing the west for perceived sins of opression of the poor huddled masses.

I have a theory. Most of US think that these gibbering savages from the 7th century could be wiped up fast if all Americans were pro-America.

Most of the left thinks that they can USE the 7th century savages to undermine US and then overturn the savages if and when the left thinks it has achieved enough of its own goals--IOW socialism/communism.

It's so important to neither over- nor under-estimate the enemy. IMO they cannot beat US. They can hurt us badly by use of nukes or bio weapons, but they can't beat us except with the complicity of our enemies domestic--if we allow it.

Unfortunately, the enemies within think THEY (weak and pitiful though they are) can out think, out plan, and outmaneuver the Islamofascists.

IMO the only thing stupider than an Islamofascist is an American lefty. They think they will prevail over the savages in the final days, but they will NOT because the savages are prepared to die in huge numbers to prevail, but the lefties are NOT. They will lose.

Unfortunately, if we allow the lefties to work with the Islamofascists (which they are doing NOW), WE will lose along with the pitiful lefties. There IS a danger and we had better BEAT it and fast!

856 posted on 10/01/2006 12:45:23 PM PDT by Sal (Once you know they sold USA out to Red China, what do you think they would NOT do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

#767, He is being kept on the ballot,but any vote for Foley will be an automatic vote for whomever the Republican Party Chairmen in each of the counties in the 16th CD select as replacement. My county chairman,and others are picking Joe Negron who is a Republican State Rep who is term limited. He was running for Attorney General until he did the right thing and bowed out so there would be no Primary for Bill Mccollum. He is a Lawyer,Loyal Republican,Conservative,family Man,and has worked in the Office of the former Congressman from 16th District. The democrat opponent looks like Jane Fonda's ex Tom Hayden,and he is a sleazy investment Counselor in Palm Beach County.


857 posted on 10/01/2006 12:46:27 PM PDT by samantha (Cheer up,the Adults are in charge,but need reinforcements very soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

They appeared to have killed your link to the report

try this one, see if it's the same thing. In the meantime I'm saving this PDF, just in case...

http://daccess-ods.un.org/TMP/9395544.html


858 posted on 10/01/2006 12:46:50 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Foley has the room next to Kerry's Girlfriend at the Kenya retreat.

I can't believe the MSM has not ONCE done a story on where is foley now. It seems he has all the aswers.

Then again a few statements saying the house did not have the IMs and the Pelosi Media Defacation ends.


859 posted on 10/01/2006 12:47:45 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: snugs
I would also say that you could have people in lower earning bracket but because of their background and beliefs would be classed as upper working or lower middle.

Sure, there's over lap. It's not set in stone.

860 posted on 10/01/2006 12:49:43 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace begins in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 848 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840841-860861-880 ... 1,041-1,044 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson