Skip to comments.
Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 1 October 2006
Various big media television networks ^
| 1 October 2006
| Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces
Posted on 10/01/2006 4:26:20 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
To: demkicker; A.Hun; texicali; snugs
I don't see how you or anyone else could think it's not a problem. It is not a problem because the one whose opinion is the only one that matters in this case, President GW Bush, did not listen to Card advice and kept Rumsfeld. This is called LEADERSHIP. Also you may have noticed that Rumsfeld stayed whereas Card is gone.
641
posted on
10/01/2006 9:18:35 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: All
642
posted on
10/01/2006 9:18:57 AM PDT
by
Txsleuth
(,((((((((ISRAEL)))))) Pray for the release of the Israelis.)
To: mystery-ak
If Card hadn't figured out that the attacks on Rumsfeld are all about style and not substance then he was in the wrong job. Further, most of the attacks on Rumsfeld are due to his Pentagon reformation and that is THE most important transformation of our time.
SHAME ON CARD.
He reveals a conversation had with Laura Bush????????????????????
643
posted on
10/01/2006 9:19:14 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
To: Bahbah
644
posted on
10/01/2006 9:19:41 AM PDT
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: demkicker
I read your post #618, and agree fully.
To: Alas Babylon!
The details are still being sorted, but a lady reporter on FoxNews said this:
Email and IM exchanges between Foley and pages were after the pages left DC.
Emails were exchanged between Foley and some pages. House GOP leadership were aware. Emails were deemed friendly but not overly sexual in nature.
IMs were exchanged between Foley and some pages. House GOP leadership were NOT aware of the IMs. IMs have since been deemed overly friendly and sexual in nature.
Florida officials are reviewing whether any formal charges may be made against Foley.
[This may all hinge on the age of consent laws in the states where the pages 'received' the IMs. That is 16 in DC & Florida - but Florida has an age-differential consideration, 17 in Louisiana. It varies.]
646
posted on
10/01/2006 9:20:40 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: YaYa123
Question. If Foley contacted the pages after they left (because rules are set up where it's not possible while they're pages), doesn't that mean the system works?
So the investigation is re: Foley's disgusting conduct... not messing with pages while they worked there?
BTW, anyone else see the email or IM of the kid requesting a reference? Or the return emails from the kid to Foley?
647
posted on
10/01/2006 9:20:46 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(The road to hell is paved with bishops - St. Athanasis)
To: OldFriend
I heard that last week, he said it was on the Today Show, I looked and couldn't find a copy of the video of those remarks, I wanted to hear them for my own ears.
To: OldFriend
I am not watching either so only picking up on what she said and others.
649
posted on
10/01/2006 9:20:51 AM PDT
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: A.Hun
"Wait till it sinks in that the assault on Foley and Republicans by the Dems, is an assault on all of many of their own lifestyles..."
The next headline should read:
"Democrats/Liberals Join CONSERVATIVES In Condemning The Gay Lifestyle!!"
That should really set them off...
Are you LISTENING Rush?? Ann?? Laura??
650
posted on
10/01/2006 9:20:52 AM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
To: McGruff; leadpenny; All
Dan Bartlett, Andrew Card, and even Brit Hume are really soft on criticizing Bob Woodward. Oh they say Woodward is wrong, they criticize his conclusions, and has taken things out of context, but ever so gently. and only after they compliment him.
Good for Dan Bartlett! He tells Blitzer you can take the same speeches and documentation Woodward used prove Bush is in denial, and prove the opposite in the president's own words.
Evidently, according to MSNBC, The White house has put out a 5 points statement on where Woodward is wrong. I haven't seen the statement.
Andrew Card will be interviewed by another MSNBC anchor babe at 1:00 pm.
651
posted on
10/01/2006 9:21:32 AM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: OldFriend
Card did not mention Laura in the interview with Eric Shawn...in that regard he stepped way over the line telling that to Woodward(if that is true).
652
posted on
10/01/2006 9:21:33 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
To: demkicker
I thought from another poster he has the President's permission to speak to Woodward.
653
posted on
10/01/2006 9:21:44 AM PDT
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: Arizona Carolyn
I've got a separate thread on this subject going
here, if you are interesting in seeing just how two-faced SaveDarfur is being with this commercial.
654
posted on
10/01/2006 9:22:02 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Tagline, go away today. I don't feel much like dancing...)
To: Alas Babylon!
>>I want to see him blow up again, or forget it!!!!!
I have been thinking about this since the first on-air melt down.
There is no down side for the pubs when Bill Clinton is in the news just prior to an election. With Bill in the news sucking up all the bandwidth, Dems who are actually running can't get their names on the news, Pubbies can "Run against Clinton" and get their names up there for free. I have concluded that the more we can get Bill to do right before the election, the better we will do in the election.
655
posted on
10/01/2006 9:22:49 AM PDT
by
DelphiUser
("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
To: Carolinamom
Brit smacked Juan!Details, please! I kept getting distracted. I'm trying to do the awards again this week, so I'm reading more than listening.
656
posted on
10/01/2006 9:23:45 AM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: jveritas
Your post #641 says it all. Thanks for your clear thinking and getting to the point of the matter.
Rumsfeld is still there.
Powell, Armitage, Card.........GONE GONE GONE
657
posted on
10/01/2006 9:23:59 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
To: YaYa123
Andrew Card will be interviewed by another MSNBC anchor babe at 1:00 pm.
I hope Card does better there than he did on Fox a little while ago......I have to leave so I won't be able to compare the two...
658
posted on
10/01/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
To: Seattle Conservative
The best comment I heard on this was from Rush. If Clinton had to show Democrats how to get a spine, then it proves they have not had one until now. (Something along this line.)
No, Democrats don't care what they have to do or say as long as they can get the power.
To: Phsstpok
It had to take some courage for Scheurer to sit there and call liars, well . . liars. It seemed to me that he came across as having nothing to gain by crossing Clinton and his cronies and their version of the history of his "legacy".
660
posted on
10/01/2006 9:24:54 AM PDT
by
Twinkie
(Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson