[Redbob]

"Just because..."

The other liberal catchphrase is
"It's not fair!"

"Fair" meaning the outcome they desire, "not fair" meaning anything else.

[thoughtomator]

Libs conveniently forget that on 9/11 they were there right along with everyone else thanking God that Al Gore wasn't President.

[Chode]

why is it that in mexco you have to give your FINGERPRINTS to get a voting card but here in the USA the RATs all whine about Picture-ID??? even welfareRATs have PICTURE ID now days!!! so... it must be the impact it will have on ILLEGAL voting that they are afraid of.

[Mygirlsmom]

What liberal Democrats refuse to accept is that they are the reason for these laws. Stop trying to give voting rights to corpses, cons and illicit border crossers, and you won't have to endure the laws enacted upon you at which you so bristle

Bingo!

[technomage]

This is just utterly ridiculous on the part of the Dims.

You are disenfranchised if you are required to show ID to vote?

Well then. Let's take the next logical steps, shall we?

All laws requiring you to show ID to purchase cigarettes are disenfranchising young people and should be abolished.

How about those pesky laws requiring you to show ID to purchase a gun? How about those background checks? How unfair to minorities who grew up in broken homes and bad neighborhoods, who may have done some 'things' when young and stupid.

Picture ID to get on a plane? Ridiculous! If a Middle Eastern looking man in his 20's tells the TSA his name is Robert O'brien, why should he be required to prove it??

Driver's license with your picture on it? Disenfranchising those poor Hispanics?

My God, the ID bill even gives the poor FREE government ID's!!

If requiring a photo ID to vote is unconstitutional (according to a number of court rulings), then ALL requirements for photo ID are unconstitutional.

Liberals are quick to point out polls that support their position. Well, if they wish to do that, then let's point out the poll that shows that 81 PERCENT of Americans WANT the Photo ID requirement. That is HUGE! And, that means that a large percentage of Democrats, Hispanics, Blacks also want it and do not seem to think it is a problem as all peeples should ALREADY HAVE government issued photo ID.

The only question is why are the Congressional Dims so against this?

Ah, we all know the answer to that one!

[Robert A Cook PE]

Bookmarked!

[NonValueAdded]

Contrast the attempts to stop voter ID's for elections with the pain and suffering necessary to by a $2.00 box of generic Sudaphed. Wally-world requires you to register name address and phone number, sign your HIPPA waiver and, for each and every purchase, present ID and sign. They claim its due to Federal regulations. I sarcastically asked the clerk if the same regimen was applied to the purchase of an anonymous Tracfone, but the poor dear didn't have a clue.

Where is the outcry for the sneezing poor?

Think that's bad? The rules get tougher tomorrow, the start of the new gubermint fiscal year! You must now pay for the purchase right then and there. I wonder if an assistant manager has to escort you out to your vehicle before you are allowed to continue shopping. If I ever buy them again - hey, they are cheap, they work for my allergies, and don't shut down the ole plumbing as do the other OTC name brands - I will use the most expensive transaction method for payment (AMEX).

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if the Oct. 1 regulations included a national purchase registry. I was ambivalent on the WOD but now am convinced it has become the WOLAC, meaning law-abiding citizens.

[Obie Wan]

Not only would I love to see voter ID's implemented, but I'd also love to see the practice of labor union members "helping" certain people while in the ballot box that I've heard has gone on in a number of places !!!

[jigsaw]

Dems are to victims what a dealer is to an addict, a benevolent predator.

Dems are predators, but they're not benevolent.

[CTposterBoy]

Yes I like what the site has to offer...