Posted on 09/30/2006 6:50:54 AM PDT by madprof98
This is exactly why this case could actually end up biting the 'Rats in the rear end, instead of the Republicans. They keep promoting the gay agenda, but here is one result of that agenda that a lot of parents are NOT going to like. I think a lot of parents are going to look beyond the political aspect (whether R or D) and think about the seduction of their own kids.
Well of course, because as we all know (from being told time & time again), pedophiles aren't GAY, ever.
". . . inherent fear the media have to delve honestly and without judgment into a person's sexual background."
Maybe inherent sense has something to do with it.
Yes, the author seems to completely equate "gay" with "Child predator". I'm sure he'd be quite upset if someone else equated the two.
>>"The only thing that will cost me the governorship is if I am caught with in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
In Mass. he could get re-elected in either case. (Gerry
Studds--re-elected 5 times after the page scandal; had a D
after his name on the ballot). And here, the dead girl
was found in the back seat of Rose Kennedy's Olds Delmont.
There is no excuse for what Foley did....
..OR what Bill Clinton did with his intern and a few cigars....
You know when I first read about this I thought there was no way it was going to bite Demonrats in the rear. But, I see it now. It is actually sad to me...they apparently covered for Foley and now are screaming and pointing fingers that we have a pervert in our ranks.
I don't care what Party Foley belongs to, I am glad the perv quit.
And I hope Foley will join the Democratic Party. They deserve each other.
Did you ever notice that outed Democrat Gays get re elected and Republicans get fired??? (Barney and Gary from Mass)
This reporter is a sleeze ball
The author is a screaming jackass. Why doesn't he just say he got a lot of pleasure out of humiliating another human being?
I think I would feel safer sending a kid to sweep floors at the mustang ranch than to DC to work for a congressman.
That may be true for most people, but as a public servant, the voter has the right to know if you prefer the company of teenage boys. Good riddance to this sick bastard.
I don't understand his premise: if you are gay you MUST be against DOMA ... or we will out you.
Isn't it possible for a gay person, closeted or out, to believe marrige is between a man and a woman? or is it like the 'pro-choice' crowd that ostracizes anyone who doesn't go along with their agenda 100%, including support of partial birth abortion or opposition to parental notification? Are they that rigid? Sure seems so.
The only reason the dimwits are screaming and pointing fingers is because there is an election in 38 days and this is about the only way the democrat can win against Foley.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.