[deport]

This does NOT include provision for the taking of private land.

---

Doesn't have to as the Public Law it is using already includes that provision[s]. How do you think they will install fences and other devices unless they make arrangements to secure property along the border. Unless they own a buffer zone along the border to which I don't know one way or the other. See USC, Title 8, Chapter 12, Subchapter 1, Sec. 1103 (b)........

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001103----000-.html

[AFPhys]

So, let's see how this looks with respect to those Demodog Senators who might just possibly be considering running for the presidency in '08 (using the fact that they were considered by someone/ anyone on tradesports.com to be worth more than 1/100 sometime during 2006):

yea - Clinton
yea - Warner
yea - Biden
yea - Bayh
yea - Obama
yea - Dodd

no. - Feingold
no. - Kerry

So, Feingold and sKerry are the only two Demodogs who are not concerned about the immigration issue. This is a winner for Republicans - no matter HOW the Dems will try to spin it.

[HiJinx]

Unless they own a buffer zone along the border to which I don't know one way or the other.

Here in Arizona they do. The way I've read today's comments, it sounds like that is not the case in some Texas counties.