[muryan]

Because she has absolutely no chance of winning. Should have dropped from the race and given someone else a chance who isnt the laughing stock of politics.

[Right_Rev]

What are you a seminar poster...
And your postion with logic is...
Maybe if the party would have backed her, she would have had a chance...

[Right_Rev]

Laughing Stock...back it up with something substantial!
Get a life of rant with the Democrats.

[Right_Rev]

It's Friday and I've had a bad week in corporate America.
Go ahead, make my day!

[Antoninus]

Because she has absolutely no chance of winning. Should have dropped from the race and given someone else a chance who isnt the laughing stock of politics.

Defeatism is for trolls, loser.

[longtermmemmory]

she is the candidate we have.

She has botched up campaigns, but I will vote for her.

She has poorly delivered her message, but her message is correct and I will vote for her.

I will not be silenced by defeatism.

Defeatism did not stop Leonidas and his spartans.

Maximizing turnout is always a victory for our side.

[LadyNavyVet]

How exactly did Harris being in the race keep others out?

The only qualifications to run for Senate are that one must be a US citizen at least 30 years of age. My copy of the Constitution left out the part that says others can't run if Katherine Harris is in the race.

[danamco]

Because she has absolutely no chance of winning. Should have dropped from the race and given someone else a chance who isnt the laughing stock of politics.

WOW!

Today's most "intelligent" quote from a FReeper LOSER!!

Waiting for you next "golden" spew!!!

[Unicorn]

Get lost.

[Onelifetogive]

Because she has absolutely no chance of winning. Should have dropped from the race and given someone else a chance who isnt the laughing stock of politics.

Anyone who would have a better chance at winning the race could have easily defeated her in the primary...

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Because she has absolutely no chance of winning. Should have dropped from the race and given someone else a chance who isnt the laughing stock of politics.

She has no chance of winning but she got 50% of the vote against 3 clowns running against her in the primary.

You're an idiot, period.

[LibertarianInExile]

"Because she has absolutely no chance of winning. Should have dropped from the race and given someone else a chance who isnt the laughing stock of politics."

Right, like Mark Foley.

[marc costanzo]

>>Because she has absolutely no chance of winning. Should have dropped from the race and given someone else a chance who isnt the laughing stock of politics.<<

Rep Katherine Harris does very much have a chance of winning this race for the U.S. Senate against lackluster incumbent Nelson .
Just because he served for multiple trms in the House, does not mean he has a lock on his Senate seat !

Katherine's chances are better now, way better than they were just a month ago .

If she wins this race, she will have THE LAST LAUGH . . .

If she wins her run for the U.S. Senate, then it means an even greater chance for Republicans to not only hold on to the number of Congressional Seats they have now, but to actually make some gains in the House and Senate at the DemoCRATS expense . . . .

"the only poll that counts is at the ballot box" -- Truman