[wagglebee]

Linda Greenhouse, speaking at a Harvard University appearance this summer, complained of a “sustained assault on women’s reproductive freedom and the hijacking of public policy by religious fundamentalism. To say that these last few years have been dispiriting is an understatement.”

"Reproductive rights" mean you get to HAVE BABIES, not murder them.

[wagglebee]

Pro-Life Ping.

[onyx]

You mean a NYT 'journalist' has an agenda?

[laweeks]

"sustained assault on women’s reproductive freedo"

I believe in "reproductive freedom." But the abortion happens AFTER the reproduction. It's amazing that they continue with this argument!

[SamuraiScot]

"To say that these last few years have been dispiriting is an understatement.”

I'm so sorry to hear that. But look at it this way: At least no one stuck scissors into your skull.

Sociopath.

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

Of course this is no surprise! Why even write about it?

[Jaysun]

".....and the hijacking of public policy by religious fundamentalism.

Stupid trollop. What is now considered "religious fundamentalism" has always ruled the day in America - until about 4 decades ago. And we were a lot better for it.

[driftless2]

Greenhouse is just continuing in the tradition of Anna "have I mentioned abortion lately" Quinlan who wrote ad nauseum about abortion "rights". Quinlan even criticized Mo Dowd for not writing about abortion "rights" enough. Believe it or not.

[blues_guitarist]

[Doctor Raoul]

Greenhouse is a little late, we already knew.

[Balding_Eagle]

A further answer to prayer.

I LIKE the divisions that are becoming more and more evident in our country.

Linda Greenhouse 'coming out' as she has is surprising only in that she admits her bias. It's always been there, just hidden.

I have no problem with the NYT's openly admitting their anti-American Values bias. More power to them.

[okie01]

“It’s been a basic tenet of journalism ... that the reporter’s ideology (has) to be suppressed and submerged, so the reader has absolute confidence that what he or she is reading is not coloured by previous views,” [public editor Dan Okrent] said.

In other words, Dan, one shouldn't get caught slanting the news? It would be "unprofessional" -- because the objective is to confer absolute confidence to slanted reports?

[quark]

GLIB LIB CRIBS FIB, LEFTY BASE LOSES FACE

[firebrand]

Wait. You're not talking about the New York Times? How can this BE???

[BLS]

"New York Times Writer of 138 Stories on Abortion Admits Pro-Abortion Bias"


Color me surprised. NOT!

[Colonel Kangaroo]

Linda Greenhouse, speaking at a Harvard University appearance this summer, complained of a “sustained assault on women’s reproductive freedom and the hijacking of public policy by religious fundamentalism. To say that these last few years have been dispiriting is an understatement.”

May she live to see something she finds really dispiriting. That's why the next two elections are so important.

[Bob J]

"“It’s been a basic tenet of journalism ... that the reporter’s ideology (has) to be suppressed and submerged, so the reader has absolute confidence that what he or she is reading is not coloured by previous views,” he said."

Laugher of the day.

[KoRn]

Reminds me of awhile back when, I think it was an ABC "journalist" who did lots of reporting dealing with gun control issues was revealed to be involved with anti gun ownership groups.

[Coleus]

the new york slimes, biased? Nah, it could never be. After the slimes leaked top-secret and classified info. that put many American lives at risk, we need to get a petition going to get the NY officials to change the name of Times Square

[Dajjal]

Pro-Life bump

[ElkGroveDan]

We need to pray for Linda and women like her. She's obviously living with a whole lot of internalized pain and guilt on this issue. She needs to come to terms with whatever it is in her past that's causing this, and seek forgiveness. Until she does that she's going to remain a angry and unhappy person.