Skip to comments.
New York Times Writer of 138 Stories on Abortion Admits Pro-Abortion Bias
LifeSiteNews ^
| 9/28/06
| Hilary White
Posted on 09/28/2006 4:39:08 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: doc1019
21
posted on
09/28/2006 5:00:32 PM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: wagglebee
Linda Greenhouse, speaking at a Harvard University appearance this summer, complained of a sustained assault on womens reproductive freedom and the hijacking of public policy by religious fundamentalism. To say that these last few years have been dispiriting is an understatement. May she live to see something she finds really dispiriting. That's why the next two elections are so important.
To: wagglebee
"Its been a basic tenet of journalism ... that the reporters ideology (has) to be suppressed and submerged, so the reader has absolute confidence that what he or she is reading is not coloured by previous views, he said."
Laugher of the day.
23
posted on
09/28/2006 5:03:35 PM PDT
by
Bob J
(RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
To: Bob J
"The New York Times reputation for objectivity ..."
??????????????
24
posted on
09/28/2006 5:05:53 PM PDT
by
daku
("Behold this creature that walks like a man. It wants ketchup on its hot dog.")
To: blues_guitarist
The most surprising part of the whole story is that she survived a liberal pregnancy.
To: wagglebee
Reminds me of awhile back when, I think it was an ABC "journalist" who did lots of reporting dealing with gun control issues was revealed to be involved with anti gun ownership groups.
26
posted on
09/28/2006 5:17:00 PM PDT
by
KoRn
To: wagglebee; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
the new york slimes, biased? Nah, it could never be. After the slimes leaked top-secret and classified info. that put many American lives at risk, we need to get a petition going to get the NY officials to change the name of Times Square
27
posted on
09/28/2006 5:17:32 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
To: narses; Pyro7480; NYer; Salvation
28
posted on
09/28/2006 5:17:44 PM PDT
by
Dajjal
To: Coleus
Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!
29
posted on
09/28/2006 5:19:28 PM PDT
by
Clemenza
(Dave? Dave?)
To: wagglebee
We need to pray for Linda and women like her. She's obviously living with a whole lot of internalized pain and guilt on this issue. She needs to come to terms with whatever it is in her past that's causing this, and seek forgiveness. Until she does that she's going to remain a angry and unhappy person.
30
posted on
09/28/2006 5:24:06 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
To: wagglebee
Linda Greenhouse Speaking of greenhouse, the New York Times out to look into whoever rights the global warming propaganda pieces. There just might be a slight bit of bias on those puppies.
To: wagglebee
So this is where the Greenhouse gases come from!
32
posted on
09/28/2006 5:32:42 PM PDT
by
choirboy
To: Always Right
I would say that printing several million unread newspapers a day that are subsequently burned produces a lot of greenhouse gases.
33
posted on
09/28/2006 5:34:32 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Its been a basic tenet of journalism ... that the reporters ideology (has) to be suppressed and submerged, so the reader has absolute confidence that what he or she is reading is not coloured by previous views, he said. I had to double check this site to make certain this wasn't a joke...NYT...NPR...ideology's submerged? Really, now.
Funniest thing I've heard all day.
34
posted on
09/28/2006 5:35:20 PM PDT
by
NewLand
(Always Remember September 11, 2001)
To: KoRn
Or, how Dan Rather didn't "realize" he was speaking at a democrat fund raiser. No, not possible it was "bias"
35
posted on
09/28/2006 5:38:05 PM PDT
by
boop
(Now Greg, you know I don't like that WORD!)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
This is odd because I've always considered the New York Times and excellent resource of unbiased news as well as as an excellent liner for my bird's cage and very good fish wrapper. Also comes in handy for small painting jobs.
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
36
posted on
09/28/2006 6:23:47 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: wagglebee; kellynla; redgirlinabluestate; DadOfTwoMarines; aimee5291; GatorGirl; maryz; ...
+
If you want on (or off) this Catholic and Pro-Life ping list, let me know!
37
posted on
09/28/2006 6:42:07 PM PDT
by
narses
(St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
To: wagglebee
The media biased? Nah, can't be!
To: narses
Many of her articles in the last 20 years have featured the fears of abortion activists that their movement has been under threat by various forces, particularly the religious right. Nope, I can't find any bias in that statement.
To: narses; cpforlife.org
I meant to post to cpforlife.org, lol.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson