Skip to comments.
New York Times Writer of 138 Stories on Abortion Admits Pro-Abortion Bias
LifeSiteNews ^
| 9/28/06
| Hilary White
Posted on 09/28/2006 4:39:08 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Linda Greenhouse, speaking at a Harvard University appearance this summer, complained of a sustained assault on womens reproductive freedom and the hijacking of public policy by religious fundamentalism. To say that these last few years have been dispiriting is an understatement. "Reproductive rights" mean you get to HAVE BABIES, not murder them.
1
posted on
09/28/2006 4:39:09 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; narses
2
posted on
09/28/2006 4:39:43 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
You mean a NYT 'journalist' has an agenda?
3
posted on
09/28/2006 4:40:41 PM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: wagglebee
"sustained assault on womens reproductive freedo"
I believe in "reproductive freedom." But the abortion happens AFTER the reproduction. It's amazing that they continue with this argument!
4
posted on
09/28/2006 4:42:35 PM PDT
by
laweeks
(I)
To: onyx
I'm simply shocked, after all this is the "paper of record."
5
posted on
09/28/2006 4:42:59 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
"To say that these last few years have been dispiriting is an understatement. I'm so sorry to hear that. But look at it this way: At least no one stuck scissors into your skull.
Sociopath.
To: wagglebee
I'm right with you: SHOCKED.
LOL
7
posted on
09/28/2006 4:44:46 PM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: wagglebee
Of course this is no surprise! Why even write about it?
8
posted on
09/28/2006 4:48:44 PM PDT
by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(The leftist-media complex: working hard for the destruction of American civilization)
To: wagglebee
".....and the hijacking of public policy by religious fundamentalism.
Stupid trollop. What is now considered "religious fundamentalism" has always ruled the day in America - until about 4 decades ago. And we were a lot better for it.
9
posted on
09/28/2006 4:50:00 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: wagglebee
Greenhouse is just continuing in the tradition of Anna "have I mentioned abortion lately" Quinlan who wrote ad nauseum about abortion "rights". Quinlan even criticized Mo Dowd for not writing about abortion "rights" enough. Believe it or not.
To: wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Greenhouse is a little late, we already knew.
12
posted on
09/28/2006 4:53:24 PM PDT
by
Doctor Raoul
(New York Times? Get a rope!)
To: onyx
She works for the NYTs
go figure!
13
posted on
09/28/2006 4:54:36 PM PDT
by
doc1019
To: wagglebee
A further answer to prayer.
I LIKE the divisions that are becoming more and more evident in our country.
Linda Greenhouse 'coming out' as she has is surprising only in that she admits her bias. It's always been there, just hidden.
I have no problem with the NYT's openly admitting their anti-American Values bias. More power to them.
14
posted on
09/28/2006 4:55:40 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who are going senile.)
To: wagglebee
Its been a basic tenet of journalism ... that the reporters ideology (has) to be suppressed and submerged, so the reader has absolute confidence that what he or she is reading is not coloured by previous views, [public editor Dan Okrent] said.
In other words, Dan, one shouldn't get caught slanting the news? It would be "unprofessional" -- because the objective is to confer absolute confidence to slanted reports?
15
posted on
09/28/2006 4:56:53 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: wagglebee
GLIB LIB CRIBS FIB, LEFTY BASE LOSES FACE
16
posted on
09/28/2006 4:56:58 PM PDT
by
quark
To: wagglebee
Wait. You're not talking about the New York Times? How can this BE???
To: firebrand
18
posted on
09/28/2006 4:58:47 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
"New York Times Writer of 138 Stories on Abortion Admits Pro-Abortion Bias"
Color me surprised. NOT!
19
posted on
09/28/2006 4:58:49 PM PDT
by
BLS
(It's time to redefine your deiphobic mind.)
To: All
Oh, pshaw. Another of my childhood beliefs shattered. If you can't trust the NYT, who can you trust?
20
posted on
09/28/2006 4:59:56 PM PDT
by
Robwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson