Posted on 09/28/2006 8:46:06 AM PDT by Vigilanteman
WASHINGTON -- Say this much for Bill Clinton. He doesn't walk quietly.
Wherever the former president goes, he can still command a large public megaphone. And, as with all things Clinton, that can be both good and bad, depending upon the view.
His white-hot, finger-wagging interview on "Fox News Sunday"--filled with accusations about conservative bias and Bush administration blunders--has thrust Clinton into the midterm election campaign just as the Republicans appeared to be erasing some healthy Democratic advantages.
For some Democrats, that's just what they would like to see: debate on a big stage between Clinton and his successor, President Bush.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
His narcissim wont let him go away. As for the hope he gets a VD, Id say its even money he already has one..
Guess the RATS forget just how much Clinton racked up in terms of Congressional loses for their party. When Bubba campoaign for them in their state--they lost. It is pretty telling they want him out and about yet again. Maybe they can get Bob Shrum signed on to run their next Presidential nominees campaign as well.
Let's hope BJ keeps his losing record in tact ...
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/09/clinton_30_octo.html
Clinton: 30 October appearances
This is always good for us. I am puzzled, to say the least, as to why these dimwits can't seem to do the simple math = Clinton shows up in a campaign=his candidate loses, nearly every single time. Why do the dims not seem to be able to comprehend what a disaster he has been for them ?
Oh well. Maybe Dean and Gore will throw their "weight" behind this.
It would be interesting: Moral turpetude and lies against Moral clarity and truth.
That said, they keep forgetting that Bush isn't running for anything anymore
Clinton is the only recent President or serious presidential candidate, as far as I know, who never allowed his medical records to be released. The two obvious guesses on why not: evidence of VD, or evidence of drug use.
"Therefore, the American people have wisely established a custom against allowing any man to hold that office for more than two consecutive terms. But every shred of power which a President exercises while in office vanishes absolutely when he has once left office. An ex-President stands precisely in the position of any other private citizen, and has not one particle more power to secure a nomination or election than if he had never held office at all, indeed, he probably has less because of the very fact that he has held the office." - Theodore Roosevelt
A third: mumps-induced sterility. Recall, that's what he told Juanita Broaderrick.
Which, if made public, would establish that Chelsea was Hillary's and...who's child?
I had forgotten that other possible reason...but would that necessarily be noted in the medical records? Does Webster Hubbell have any other children? He could have had mumps too...and not everyone who has mumps becomes sterile.
But I assume his records would include a list of childhood diseases. Whether it would note any particular outcome from a case of the mumps, I don't know.
Both of your alternatives are plausible, as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.