Replies

Frankly though, he strikes me as a little bit naive, in that he assumes that we're really being told the full truth of just what's going on here, when in fact there is considerable disinformation surrounding this entire subject. I imagine him as the kindly old senior citizen type who depends on the government bureaucratic apparatus and trusts it implicitly.

99% of the misinformation about the anthrax attacks comes from the MEDIA.

I voted "Anybody But Bush" in the last Presidential election, and I think the current administration is top-heavy with total incompetents. But that doesn't mean I automatically believe or disbelieve anything about the anthrax attacks based upon who says it. I've spent the past 5 years collecting FACTS to challenge OPINIONS.

I point out all errors I find, regardless of who made them.

I do not assume that facts I don't like are false.

The FBI has been saying since the very beginning that the attack anthrax did not have any additives.

What is needed is an explanation from the Armed Forces Institutes of Pathology (AFIP) telling us why they said there WAS an additive in the Daschle anthrax, that the additive was silica, and that it was a "key component". They said that in their newsletter, which can be read by clicking HERE.

Congressman Holt is wasting his time by demanding explanations from the FBI when he should be demanding explanations from AFIP.

Wow! All of the long time no see-ers are coming back after a long hiatus. All we need now is The Great Satan and the old "Anthrax Profiler" (now Gene Vidocq) to come back and it'll be like a big fifth year anniversary reunion.

I voted "Anybody But Bush" in the last Presidential election, and I think the current administration is top-heavy with total incompetents.

I'm not in the least bit surprised, but we digress from the subject.

I know you believe the Bureau when they insist that it isn't a cold case. So, when do you think we can look forward to seeing someone doing the perp walk on television?

Oh, and if I were Congressman Holt, I have a feeling he's not going to be getting any answers that he finds satisfactory, if the Bureau even deigns to respond to his request at all. I had never heard of the guy before this, which means that in the legislative hierarchy he's pretty much a backbench nobody.