Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake
Wow! All of the long time no see-ers are coming back after a long hiatus. All we need now is The Great Satan and the old "Anthrax Profiler" (now Gene Vidocq) to come back and it'll be like a big fifth year anniversary reunion.

I voted "Anybody But Bush" in the last Presidential election, and I think the current administration is top-heavy with total incompetents.

I'm not in the least bit surprised, but we digress from the subject.

I know you believe the Bureau when they insist that it isn't a cold case. So, when do you think we can look forward to seeing someone doing the perp walk on television?

Oh, and if I were Congressman Holt, I have a feeling he's not going to be getting any answers that he finds satisfactory, if the Bureau even deigns to respond to his request at all. I had never heard of the guy before this, which means that in the legislative hierarchy he's pretty much a backbench nobody.

19 posted on 09/28/2006 10:42:23 AM PDT by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: jpl
I know you believe the Bureau when they insist that it isn't a cold case. So, when do you think we can look forward to seeing someone doing the perp walk on television?

I think they need to create a level playing field first. With politicians like Rush Holt having total misconceptions about the facts, and with The Washington Post filling everyone's heads with nonsense upon nonsense, the FBI needs to set the record straight about additives in the anthrax and where all the nonsense about coatings came from. Then they need to set the record straight about who went after Dr. Hatfill and why.

Once they clear away the mountain of CRAP built by the media and by politically motivated scientists and politicians, then maybe they can risk making an arrest without near certainty that their arrest will have to overcome a mountain of reasonable doubt in court. An arrest and conviction will depend a great deal on scientific evidence. As long as thousands of scientist believe the crap printed in Science magazine and The Washington Post about additives and the need for additives, the FBI can't make an arrest. The media would make it look like an arrest of some scientist the media never previously suspected is just another part of the FBI's coverup of some secret and illegal U.S. government biological weapons program.

Ed

21 posted on 09/28/2006 11:00:54 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson